Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 5, 2023·Ball Arena, Denver

Seattle Kraken 3, Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SEA0711111611335
COL161100700223

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:19COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Artturi Lehkonen, Valeri Nichushkin · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:52SEAAlexander WennbergAssists: Will Borgen, Jaden Schwartz · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:45COLDenis MalginAssists: Cale Makar, Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P3 17:30SEABrandon TanevAssists: Jaden Schwartz · Snap, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:24SEAYanni GourdeGWGAssists: Vince Dunn, Matty Beniers · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 15:12SEAJordan Eberle: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P2 2:26COLCale Makar: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 13:13COLValeri Nichushkin: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 0:00COLJack Johnson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 0:00COLMikko Rantanen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P3 2:49SEABrandon Tanev: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 5:54COLMatt Nieto: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
49% to win51% to win
← SEA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Compher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEACOL
35Shots on goal23
3.2Expected goals2.6
64Shot attempts45
24Faceoffs won33
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
24Hits17
9Blocked shots17
7Giveaways8
9Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. Donato – Tanev – Geekie5:34

    xG 0.11–0.08 (59%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – McCann – Beniers10:27

    xG 0.21–0.18 (54%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Gourde – Tolvanen – Froden7:16

    xG 0.35–0.33 (51%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  4. Schwartz – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg8:31

    xG 0.20–0.62 (25%)attempts 4–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Soucy11:44

    xG 0.60–0.48 (56%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0

  2. Oleksiak – Borgen12:52

    xG 0.17–0.12 (60%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  3. Larsson – Dunn16:02

    xG 0.68–0.98 (41%)attempts 19–11goals 0–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestRodrigues – Malgin – Newhook6:12

    xG 0.49–0.00 (99%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Cogliano – Eller – O'Connor7:10

    xG 0.33–0.05 (87%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Rantanen4:49

    xG 0.07–0.22 (25%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  4. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Nichushkin7:00

    xG 0.12–0.28 (30%)attempts 2–6goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar12:31

    xG 0.63–0.25 (72%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  2. Johnson – Hunt6:53

    xG 0.45–0.13 (77%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Toews – Byram2:30

    xG 0.03–0.12 (18%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.6 xGSEA 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #387 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.05 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).