Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 28, 2023·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Detroit Red Wings 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 62% of the time.

DET winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT09314116439
DET31004411725

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:03DETJonatan BerggrenPPAssists: Austin Czarnik, Joseph Veleno · Slap, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:37DETAndrew CoppAssists: Moritz Seider, Pius Suter · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:07DETDominik KubalikAssists: Gustav Lindstrom, Jordan Oesterle · Deflected, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:40PITJason ZuckerAssists: Rickard Rakell, Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.26 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:46PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Rickard Rakell · Deflected, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P2 8:41PITJeff CarterPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Jeff Petry · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:05DETDavid PerronAssists: Dylan Larkin · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:26PITJosh ArchibaldAssists: Drew O'Connor, Kris Letang · Wrap-around, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. P3 16:20DETDavid PerronPPGWGAssists: Moritz Seider, Andrew Copp · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–5
  10. P3 17:05DETDavid PerronAssists: Dylan Larkin, Jordan Oesterle · Backhand, 0.05 xG4–6
  11. P3 19:23DETDylan LarkinENAssists: Pius Suter · Wrist, 0.76 xG4–7
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:48PITMark Friedman: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 9:03PITMark Friedman: Boarding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:49DETAustin Czarnik: Holding2 min
  4. P2 6:44DETGustav Lindstrom: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:21DETJake Walman: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:41DETDavid Perron: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  7. P2 11:16DET: Game misconduct head coach0 min
  8. P2 16:16DETDylan Larkin: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:07DETDominik Kubalik: Boarding2 min
  10. P3 16:12PITBryan Rust: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
49% to win51% to win
← PIT attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Copp
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITDET
39Shots on goal25
3.8Expected goals4.4
70Shot attempts59
37Faceoffs won33
6Power plays3
6Penalty minutes12
6Hits18
17Blocked shots14
6Giveaways7
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Archibald – O'Connor3:59

    xG 0.39–0.10 (81%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Zucker – Granlund2:24

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Archibald – Poehling – O'Connor2:15

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Zucker – Rakell7:12

    xG 0.56–0.44 (56%)attempts 7–12goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Joseph11:51

    xG 1.01–0.72 (58%)attempts 15–18goals 1–2

  2. Petry – Dumoulin4:39

    xG 0.08–0.01 (87%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Dumoulin11:04

    xG 0.31–0.34 (47%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestLuff – Veleno – Hirose6:43

    xG 0.12–0.03 (80%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Copp – Suter – Raymond10:06

    xG 0.42–0.44 (49%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  3. Perron – Kubalik – Larkin10:28

    xG 0.74–0.77 (49%)attempts 14–13goals 3–1

  4. Erne – Czarnik – Berggren6:00

    xG 0.04–0.22 (17%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWalman – Seider16:02

    xG 0.80–0.54 (59%)attempts 19–11goals 2–0

  2. Hagg – Lindstrom9:03

    xG 0.37–0.18 (68%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  3. Oesterle – Lindstrom3:41

    xG 0.10–0.28 (26%)attempts 1–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 4.4 xGPIT 3.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #20 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.28 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 62% of the time.

DET winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).