Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 6, 2023·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Buffalo Sabres 7, Detroit Red Wings 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 59% of the time.

DET winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF31617210032736
DET2821428021632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:35BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Dylan Cozens, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:38DETAustin CzarnikAssists: Jonatan Berggren, Jake Walman · Snap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:05DETDylan LarkinPPAssists: Lucas Raymond, Moritz Seider · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:10BUFHenri JokiharjuAssists: Alex Tuch, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P1 19:08BUFDylan CozensPPAssists: Peyton Krebs, Owen Power · Slap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 1:33BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Kyle Okposo, Owen Power · Tip-in, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P2 16:04DETAlex ChiassonPPAssists: Dylan Larkin, Lucas Raymond · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–3
  8. P2 16:52DETSimon EdvinssonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.00 xG4–4
  9. P3 3:20BUFJordan GreenwayAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Henri Jokiharju · Snap, 0.06 xG5–4
  10. P3 4:32BUFDylan CozensAssists: Tage Thompson, Rasmus Dahlin · Snap, 0.11 xG6–4
  11. P3 8:02DETJonatan BerggrenAssists: Matt Luff · Backhand, 0.20 xG6–5
  12. P3 19:00DETDavid PerronAssists: Moritz Seider, Lucas Raymond · Slap, 0.08 xG6–6

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Tage Thompson stopped
  2. 2. DET Lucas Raymond scored
  3. 3. BUF Jack Quinn scored
  4. 4. DET David Perron stopped
  5. 5. BUF Alex Tuch scored
  6. 6. DET Dylan Larkin stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:00DETDylan Larkin: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  2. P1 7:02DETJake Walman: Holding2 min
  3. P1 14:03BUFJJ Peterka: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 17:10BUFJeff Skinner: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 17:10DETDylan Larkin: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P1 17:10DETJake Walman: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 17:10DETJake Walman: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 11:11BUFKyle Okposo: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 15:00BUFHenri Jokiharju: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Mittelstadt won the faceoff against Copp
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFDET
36Shots on goal32
3.6Expected goals3.1
53Shot attempts52
26Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
9Hits14
12Blocked shots5
8Giveaways13
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGreenway – Thompson – Cozens10:19

    xG 0.56–0.26 (68%)attempts 9–6goals 2–1

  2. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs9:56

    xG 0.46–0.37 (55%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  3. Skinner – Tuch – Mittelstadt11:07

    xG 0.22–0.34 (39%)attempts 8–7goals 1–1

  4. Jost – Quinn – Peterka7:45

    xG 0.23–0.60 (28%)attempts 4–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Power14:19

    xG 0.78–0.54 (59%)attempts 15–8goals 4–1

  2. Stillman – Lyubushkin9:20

    xG 0.29–0.53 (35%)attempts 8–8goals 0–2

  3. Samuelsson – Dahlin18:55

    xG 0.55–0.86 (39%)attempts 9–21goals 1–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestCzarnik – Luff – Berggren6:19

    xG 0.76–0.13 (85%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Copp – Suter – Raymond10:07

    xG 0.20–0.13 (61%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Perron – Larkin – Raymond2:25

    xG 0.15–0.21 (42%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  4. Chiasson – Erne – Veleno8:00

    xG 0.08–0.39 (18%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestChiarot – Edvinsson12:19

    xG 1.08–0.70 (61%)attempts 16–8goals 3–3

  2. Maatta – Oesterle14:33

    xG 0.55–0.34 (62%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  3. Walman – Seider16:17

    xG 0.24–0.57 (30%)attempts 11–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.1 xGBUF 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #10 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.53 · 12 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 59% of the time.

DET winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).