Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 6, 2024·Ball Arena, Denver

Florida Panthers 8, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 73% of the time.

COL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA31017412829
COL0831414426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:10FLACarter VerhaegheAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Sam Bennett · Snap, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:02FLASam ReinhartAssists: Gustav Forsling, Aleksander Barkov · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P1 7:41FLASam ReinhartAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–0
  4. P2 0:21COLCale MakarAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 0:52COLJosh MansonAssists: Valeri Nichushkin, Logan O'Connor · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 4:35COLValeri NichushkinPPAssists: Cale Makar, Mikko Rantanen · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P2 8:50FLAOliver Ekman-LarssonAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–3
  8. P3 3:31COLJonathan DrouinAssists: Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–4
  9. P3 5:59FLASam ReinhartPPGWGAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Aleksander Barkov · Wrist, 0.18 xG5–4
  10. P3 8:59FLAKevin StenlundAssists: Ryan Lomberg · Backhand, 0.05 xG6–4
  11. P3 16:17FLAMatthew TkachukAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.00 xG7–4
  12. P3 16:54FLACarter VerhaegheENAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Gustav Forsling · Backhand, 0.62 xG8–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 11:48FLAAleksander Barkov: High sticking double minor4 min
  2. P1 16:59COLFredrik Olofsson: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 4:00FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 4:00COLSamuel Girard: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 4:00FLAMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 16:56FLARyan Lomberg: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 4:47COLRoss Colton: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  8. P3 5:13COLLogan O'Connor: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 17:56COLKurtis MacDermid: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACOL
29Shots on goal26
3.0Expected goals1.8
54Shot attempts38
28Faceoffs won28
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
14Hits18
6Blocked shots17
1Giveaways5
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBarkov – Reinhart – Rodrigues12:07

    xG 0.69–0.27 (72%)attempts 12–8goals 3–1

  2. Lomberg – Luostarinen – Lundell5:38

    xG 0.14–0.03 (82%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Stenlund – Lomberg – Luostarinen3:11

    xG 0.07–0.02 (76%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Stenlund – Lockwood – Gadjovich4:35

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling12:04

    xG 0.50–0.38 (57%)attempts 10–11goals 2–1

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Kulikov12:53

    xG 0.16–0.19 (45%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Montour – Mikkola14:11

    xG 0.28–0.47 (37%)attempts 11–12goals 1–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestNichushkin – Colton – O'Connor8:43

    xG 0.33–0.16 (68%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  2. Cogliano – Johansen – Kiviranta6:13

    xG 0.08–0.02 (80%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. MacDermid – Olofsson – Meyers4:07

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  4. MacKinnon – Drouin – Rantanen13:43

    xG 0.50–0.59 (46%)attempts 12–13goals 2–3

Defence pairs

  1. Johnson – Jones7:17

    xG 0.07–0.04 (61%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Manson2:45

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Manson – Toews2:13

    xG 0.01–0.07 (7%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.8 xGFLA 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #36 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 73% of the time.

COL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).