Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 13, 2024·United Center, Chicago

Vancouver Canucks 4, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 85% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN112213113438
CHI02112110224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:05VANConor GarlandAssists: Dakota Joshua, Filip Hronek · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P2 8:18VANConor GarlandAssists: Filip Hronek, Dakota Joshua · Deflected, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:43CHITyler JohnsonPPAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:28VANNils HoglanderGWGAssists: Elias Lindholm · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:07VANDakota JoshuaAssists: Teddy Blueger, Quinn Hughes · Backhand, 0.16 xG4–1
  6. P3 13:27CHIKevin KorchinskiAssists: Ryan Donato, Lukas Reichel · Snap, 0.16 xG4–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 6:02CHIJoey Anderson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:45VANSam Lafferty: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 19:00VANIan Cole: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 1:37CHIColin Blackwell: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 12:35CHINick Foligno: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:13VANJ.T. Miller: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 18:59VANTyler Myers: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 1:49CHIJason Dickinson: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 16:08VANDakota Joshua: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 16:08CHIMacKenzie Entwistle: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Blueger won the faceoff against Entwistle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCHI
38Shots on goal24
5.0Expected goals2.3
66Shot attempts47
25Faceoffs won25
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
20Hits18
10Blocked shots10
6Giveaways7
9Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBlueger – Joshua – Garland6:49

    xG 1.05–0.34 (75%)attempts 12–5goals 3–1

  2. Lindholm – Pettersson – Hoglander8:19

    xG 0.77–0.19 (81%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Miller – Boeser – Suter10:44

    xG 0.57–0.20 (74%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  4. Di Giuseppe – Lafferty – Mikheyev7:01

    xG 0.32–0.48 (40%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Myers13:53

    xG 0.65–0.09 (87%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Friedman – Juulsen9:31

    xG 0.84–0.33 (72%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Hronek – Hughes13:29

    xG 1.19–0.83 (59%)attempts 15–11goals 3–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSanford – Donato – Reichel4:32

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Dickinson – Anderson6:31

    xG 0.28–0.20 (59%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Blackwell – Entwistle – Johnson3:49

    xG 0.42–0.44 (49%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  4. Foligno – Johnson – Kurashev2:47

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMegna – Phillips4:05

    xG 0.47–0.36 (56%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  2. Phillips – Korchinski2:09

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Megna – Crevier2:09

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.3 xGVAN 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #788 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.19 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 85% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).