Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 2, 2024·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Montréal Canadiens 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 59% of the time.

TBL winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MTL21106113011331
TBL04213111012429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:27MTLJoel ArmiaAssists: Kaiden Guhle, Alex Newhook · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:34MTLJake EvansAssists: Brendan Gallagher · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:44TBLBrayden PointAssists: Steven Stamkos, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:49TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Brandon Hagel · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:23MTLJosh AndersonAssists: Cole Caufield, Arber Xhekaj · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:18TBLTyler MotteSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TBL Brandon Hagel stopped
  2. 2. MTL Nick Suzuki stopped
  3. 3. TBL Brayden Point stopped
  4. 4. MTL Cole Caufield scored
  5. 5. TBL Steven Stamkos scored
  6. 6. MTL Joel Armia stopped
  7. 7. TBL Nikita Kucherov stopped
  8. 8. MTL Jesse Ylonen stopped
  9. 9. TBL Michael Eyssimont stopped
  10. 10. MTL Juraj Slafkovský stopped
  11. 11. TBL Victor Hedman scored
  12. 12. MTL Joshua Roy stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:25TBLErik Cernak: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 3:25TBLErik Cernak: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 3:25MTLArber Xhekaj: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 11:55MTLBrendan Gallagher: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 9:30TBLMitchell Chaffee: Boarding2 min
  6. OT 1:09MTLCole Caufield: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cirelli won the faceoff against Suzuki
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLTBL
31Shots on goal29
3.1Expected goals2.5
57Shot attempts59
28Faceoffs won29
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
24Hits25
13Blocked shots16
1Giveaways7
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestGallagher – Anderson – Evans11:42

    xG 1.17–0.19 (86%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  2. Pearson – White – Ylonen6:59

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský15:25

    xG 0.76–0.67 (53%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1

  4. Armia – Newhook – Roy10:01

    xG 0.38–0.57 (40%)attempts 7–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKovacevic – Harris10:47

    xG 1.32–0.17 (88%)attempts 18–5goals 1–0

  2. Savard – Xhekaj14:27

    xG 0.76–0.50 (60%)attempts 17–13goals 1–1

  3. Savard – Harris4:07

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Point9:43

    xG 0.43–0.18 (70%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Cirelli – Hagel – Chaffee7:32

    xG 0.62–0.42 (60%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  3. Cirelli – Eyssimont – Chaffee2:35

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Stamkos – Kucherov – Paul2:16

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCrozier – Lilleberg2:04

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Hedman – Crozier11:44

    xG 0.40–0.30 (57%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  3. Fleury – Cernak13:20

    xG 0.68–0.66 (51%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.5 xGMTL 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #247 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.12 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 59% of the time.

TBL winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).