Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 16, 2024·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Tampa Bay Lightning 5, Florida Panthers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 76% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL2112312516
FLA012218120350

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:20TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Erik Cernak · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:21TBLMichael EyssimontAssists: Nick Paul, Nick Perbix · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–0
  3. P2 3:02TBLDarren RaddyshAssists: Anthony Duclair, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P2 6:59TBLSteven StamkosPPGWGAssists: Victor Hedman, Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.13 xG4–0
  5. P2 8:23FLAMatthew TkachukSHAssists: Josh Mahura · Snap, 0.12 xG4–1
  6. P2 11:55FLASam ReinhartPPAssists: Sam Bennett, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–2
  7. P3 16:08FLASam ReinhartUnassisted · Snap, 0.20 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:28TBLNikita KucherovENAssists: Brandon Hagel, Steven Stamkos · Backhand, 0.76 xG5–3
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 5:42TBLMathew Dumba: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 14:33FLASam Bennett: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 15:10TBLNikita Kucherov: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 15:10TBLNikita Kucherov: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 15:10FLASam Reinhart: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 17:54TBLNick Perbix: Delaying game2 min
  7. P2 3:38FLADmitry Kulikov: Match penalty5 min · PPG
  8. P2 3:38TBLMichael Eyssimont: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 6:51FLAOliver Ekman-Larsson: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 10:31TBLLuke Glendening: Hooking2 min · PPG
  11. P2 15:27TBLErik Cernak: Tripping2 min
  12. P2 16:34TBLMathew Dumba: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 7:38TBLAnthony Duclair: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 9:44FLASam Bennett: Holding2 min
  15. P3 13:35FLAGustav Forsling: Holding2 min
  16. P3 19:36FLACarter Verhaeghe: Closing hand on puck2 min
  17. P3 19:53FLARyan Lomberg: Kneeing2 min
  18. P3 19:53TBLMathew Dumba: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 19:53FLANiko Mikkola: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLFLA
16Shots on goal50
2.5Expected goals4.1
37Shot attempts80
38Faceoffs won32
7Power plays7
28Penalty minutes29
15Hits25
16Blocked shots10
15Giveaways13
2Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Cirelli – Hagel6:43

    xG 0.28–0.14 (66%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  2. Paul – Sheary – Eyssimont6:53

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  3. Glendening – Motte – Chaffee4:21

    xG 0.10–0.11 (47%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Kucherov – Duclair – Point8:59

    xG 0.28–0.48 (37%)attempts 3–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCernak – Perbix9:38

    xG 0.48–0.36 (57%)attempts 6–12goals 2–0

  2. Hedman – Raddysh8:10

    xG 0.24–0.26 (48%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  3. de Haan – Dumba11:12

    xG 0.28–0.50 (36%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestTarasenko – Luostarinen – Lundell4:59

    xG 0.48–0.03 (94%)attempts 8–1goals 0–1

  2. Verhaeghe – Barkov – Reinhart6:20

    xG 0.45–0.00 (100%)attempts 12–0goals 1–0

  3. Rodrigues – Luostarinen – Lundell3:27

    xG 0.11–0.05 (67%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Bennett – Rodrigues – Tkachuk4:28

    xG 0.10–0.09 (52%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontour – Mahura2:20

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Forsling8:15

    xG 0.22–0.01 (94%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Forsling3:21

    xG 0.27–0.09 (75%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 4.1 xGTBL 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #256 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 76% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).