Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 17, 2024·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 60% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF04310110424
CBJ292927625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:12CBJEgor ChinakhovPPAssists: Zach Werenski, Kent Johnson · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:28CBJKirill MarchenkoUnassisted · Snap, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:34BUFRyan McLeodAssists: Jason Zucker, Jordan Greenway · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:18CBJAdam FantilliAssists: Zach Werenski, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:29BUFJiri KulichAssists: Dylan Cozens, Henri Jokiharju · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:58CBJMathieu OlivierAssists: Cole Sillinger, Jake Christiansen · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P2 19:35BUFOwen PowerUnassisted · Snap, 0.07 xG3–4
  8. P3 0:15CBJZachary Aston-ReeseGWGAssists: Jake Christiansen, Mathieu Olivier · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–5
  9. P3 8:10CBJDamon SeversonAssists: Kirill Marchenko · Snap, 0.16 xG3–6
  10. P3 17:51BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Tage Thompson, Rasmus Dahlin · Slap, 0.05 xG4–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 4:26BUFConnor Clifton: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:09BUFDylan Cozens: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 16:58CBJMathieu Olivier: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 0:52BUFAlex Tuch: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 5:28CBJIvan Provorov: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fantilli won the faceoff against McLeod
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
24Shots on goal25
2.3Expected goals1.7
56Shot attempts43
28Faceoffs won27
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
18Hits16
8Blocked shots17
13Giveaways14
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Kulich – Benson9:17

    xG 0.32–0.12 (73%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Zucker – Greenway – McLeod10:20

    xG 0.45–0.26 (63%)attempts 8–9goals 2–2

  3. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Krebs6:18

    xG 0.07–0.14 (34%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

  4. Tuch – Thompson – Peterka11:55

    xG 0.19–0.63 (23%)attempts 10–19goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Samuelsson7:35

    xG 0.58–0.24 (71%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  2. Jokiharju – Dahlin10:10

    xG 0.18–0.01 (96%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Byram7:24

    xG 0.08–0.17 (32%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMonahan – Marchenko – Chinakhov13:26

    xG 0.70–0.17 (80%)attempts 19–5goals 1–1

  2. Kuraly – Olivier – Aston-Reese4:22

    xG 0.12–0.17 (40%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Johnson – Fantilli3:41

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Olivier – Aston-Reese – Fantilli2:58

    xG 0.11–0.21 (34%)attempts 1–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeverson – Christiansen12:56

    xG 0.52–0.32 (62%)attempts 8–8goals 3–0

  2. Werenski – Provorov13:39

    xG 0.54–0.37 (60%)attempts 22–14goals 1–1

  3. Provorov – Harris2:35

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.7 xGBUF 2.3 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #248 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.40 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 60% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).