Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 28, 2024·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Florida Panthers 5, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA26111214531
BUF0821208228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:01FLAJesper BoqvistAssists: Anton Lundell, Eetu Luostarinen · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:56FLASam ReinhartPPAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Carter Verhaeghe · Snap, 0.27 xG2–0
  3. P2 10:45BUFJason ZuckerPPAssists: Tage Thompson, JJ Peterka · Bat, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:37BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Owen Power · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:44FLACarter VerhaegheGWGAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Sam Bennett · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:35FLASam BennettPPAssists: Nate Schmidt · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:43FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Sam Reinhart, Gustav Forsling · Wrist, 0.05 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 11:38BUFConnor Clifton: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:21BUFHenri Jokiharju: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:14BUFOwen Power: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 10:38FLAEetu Luostarinen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 3:15FLASam Bennett: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 10:32BUFPeyton Krebs: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 10:32FLAA.J. Greer: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P3 13:00BUFRasmus Dahlin: Roughing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 13:00BUFRasmus Dahlin: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 13:00FLAJesper Boqvist: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 18:10FLACarter Verhaeghe: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00McLeod won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLABUF
31Shots on goal28
2.6Expected goals1.9
53Shot attempts54
22Faceoffs won40
4Power plays3
10Penalty minutes12
19Hits24
11Blocked shots14
13Giveaways9
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk12:23

    xG 0.46–0.09 (84%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Greer – Giles – Samoskevich6:00

    xG 0.31–0.05 (86%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Barkov – Reinhart – Rodrigues12:02

    xG 0.26–0.18 (60%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  4. Boqvist – Luostarinen – Lundell7:50

    xG 0.37–0.35 (51%)attempts 5–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling14:33

    xG 0.64–0.38 (63%)attempts 11–16goals 1–0

  2. Kulikov – Mikkola15:47

    xG 0.48–0.47 (51%)attempts 10–18goals 2–0

  3. Schmidt – Balinskis11:40

    xG 0.52–0.51 (50%)attempts 14–8goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestAube-Kubel – Lafferty – Malenstyn2:01

    xG 0.35–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Krebs3:14

    xG 0.02–0.01 (67%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Zucker – Greenway – McLeod10:26

    xG 0.07–0.15 (30%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  4. Krebs – Cozens – Quinn6:08

    xG 0.23–0.50 (32%)attempts 3–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Power3:14

    xG 0.56–0.23 (71%)attempts 9–4goals 1–1

  2. Jokiharju – Byram2:36

    xG 0.07–0.02 (73%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Power2:04

    xG 0.06–0.03 (65%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.9 xGFLA 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #365 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.48 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).