Tue, Dec 3, 2024·Canada Life Centre, Winnipeg
St. Louis Blues 4, Winnipeg Jets 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 90% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 06 | 219 | 27 | 432 |
| WPG | 08 | 03 | 112 | 123 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 18:04STLJordan KyrouAssists: Brayden Schenn, Philip Broberg · Deflected, 0.14 xG1–0
- P2 18:43STLDylan HollowayGWGAssists: Robert Thomas, Scott Perunovich · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–0
- P3 6:38STLJordan KyrouAssists: Dylan Holloway, Scott Perunovich · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–0
- P3 15:45WPGMark ScheifeleAssists: Neal Pionk, Josh Morrissey · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–1
- P3 16:21STLRobert ThomasENAssists: Radek Faksa, Brandon Saad · Wrist, 0.44 xG4–1
Penalties (5)
- P2 6:56WPGDylan DeMelo: Holding the stick2 min
- P2 11:30STLNathan Walker: Slashing2 min
- P2 16:49STLJake Neighbours: Tripping2 min
- P2 16:53WPGGabriel Vilardi: Interference2 min
- P3 7:05WPGVille Heinola: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Faksa won the faceoff against Scheifele
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestSundqvist – Joseph – Bolduc10:09
xG 0.55–0.13 (81%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0
- Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway12:22
xG 0.68–0.55 (55%)attempts 8–14goals 1–0
- Faksa – Walker – Toropchenko8:35
xG 0.08–0.07 (51%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0
- Saad – Thomas – Neighbours11:20
xG 0.30–0.41 (42%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJoseph – Perunovich8:10
xG 0.56–0.25 (69%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0
- Parayko – Broberg16:42
xG 0.08–0.35 (19%)attempts 6–17goals 0–0
- Suter – Kessel16:04
xG 0.28–0.57 (33%)attempts 7–19goals 0–0
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestScheifele – Namestnikov – Connor9:25
xG 0.27–0.13 (68%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0
- Scheifele – Connor – Vilardi4:38
xG 0.22–0.09 (72%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0
- Namestnikov – Perfetti – Lambert2:38
xG 0.00–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- Vilardi – Perfetti – Lambert7:30
xG 0.03–0.15 (19%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestDeMelo – Morrissey15:59
xG 0.35–0.24 (60%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0
- Stanley – Heinola11:14
xG 0.15–0.42 (26%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0
- Fleury – Pionk12:51
xG 0.32–0.70 (31%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 90% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (WPG − STL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).