Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 17, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 75% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT0631023519
BUF110013119242

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:16BUFOwen PowerPPAssists: Zach Benson, Bowen Byram · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:41PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Matt Grzelcyk · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:08PITAnthony BeauvillierAssists: Cody Glass · Snap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:43PITCody GlassPPGWGAssists: Philip Tomasino, Alex Nedeljkovic · Snap, 0.23 xG3–1
  5. P3 1:09PITBryan RustPPAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Michael Bunting · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 14:46BUFZach BensonAssists: Tage Thompson, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:18PITAlex NedeljkovicENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.24 xG5–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:57BUFJack Quinn: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 12:24PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:31BUFRasmus Dahlin: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:50BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 12:07PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 18:35PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P2 19:26BUFTage Thompson: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P3 4:42PITOwen Pickering: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 9:11PITMichael Bunting: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 9:11BUFPeyton Krebs: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 12:03BUFJason Zucker: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 12:03PITRyan Graves: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against McLeod
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
19Shots on goal42
2.8Expected goals4.4
47Shot attempts82
32Faceoffs won26
4Power plays5
22Penalty minutes20
21Hits19
17Blocked shots14
12Giveaways9
6Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Tomasino – O'Connor8:14

    xG 0.27–0.17 (61%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Bunting – Beauvillier8:49

    xG 0.33–0.44 (43%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Rakell9:22

    xG 0.09–0.53 (15%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

  4. Acciari – Glass – Lizotte6:54

    xG 0.07–0.58 (11%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Graves – Joseph8:09

    xG 0.08–0.19 (28%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  2. Grzelcyk – Pickering2:20

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  3. Grzelcyk – Pettersson9:55

    xG 0.35–0.51 (41%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – Thompson – McLeod10:20

    xG 0.50–0.09 (85%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Tuch – Cozens – Peterka6:48

    xG 0.52–0.13 (80%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  3. Krebs – Quinn – Benson8:02

    xG 0.33–0.20 (62%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  4. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Kozak5:38

    xG 0.09–0.23 (28%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Power5:21

    xG 0.69–0.14 (83%)attempts 17–1goals 0–0

  2. Dahlin – Byram6:29

    xG 0.30–0.02 (94%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Power8:16

    xG 0.48–0.27 (64%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.4 xGPIT 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #617 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 75% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).