Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 8, 2025·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Chicago Blackhawks 5, St. Louis Blues 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 78% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CHI280336041521
STL01031728052640

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:04CHICraig SmithAssists: Patrick Maroon, Alec Martinez · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:42CHIRyan DonatoAssists: Connor Bedard · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 1:40STLPhilip BrobergAssists: Mathieu Joseph, Brayden Schenn · Slap, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:50STLNathan WalkerUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:09STLMathieu JosephAssists: Brayden Schenn, Dylan Holloway · Snap, 0.17 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:50CHIAlec MartinezAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Ilya Mikheyev · Snap, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:32STLCam FowlerAssists: Robert Thomas, Pavel Buchnevich · Wrist, 0.00 xG3–4
  8. P3 6:08CHITeuvo TeravainenAssists: Nick Foligno, Ilya Mikheyev · Slap, 0.04 xG4–4
  9. P3 11:08CHIIlya MikheyevAssists: Nick Foligno, Alex Vlasic · Backhand, 0.11 xG5–4
  10. P3 15:23STLRobert ThomasAssists: Philip Broberg, Zachary Bolduc · Poke, 0.14 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Jake Neighbours stopped
  2. 2. CHI Connor Bedard stopped
  3. 3. STL Brayden Schenn scored
  4. 4. CHI Teuvo Teravainen scored
  5. 5. STL Dylan Holloway stopped
  6. 6. CHI Ryan Donato stopped
  7. 7. STL Jordan Kyrou stopped
  8. 8. CHI Craig Smith stopped
  9. 9. STL Robert Thomas stopped
  10. 10. CHI Lukas Reichel stopped
  11. 11. STL Pavel Buchnevich stopped
  12. 12. CHI Frank Nazar stopped
  13. 13. STL Zachary Bolduc stopped
  14. 14. CHI Ilya Mikheyev stopped
  15. 15. STL Nathan Walker stopped
  16. 16. CHI Patrick Maroon stopped
  17. 17. STL Mathieu Joseph stopped
  18. 18. CHI Nick Foligno stopped
  19. 19. STL Radek Faksa scored
  20. 20. CHI Tyler Bertuzzi stopped
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 7:51CHIRyan Donato: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 11:58CHISeth Jones: Hooking2 min
  3. P3 12:15STLJordan Kyrou: Unsportsmanlike conduct bench2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
43% to win57% to win
← CHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Faksa won the faceoff against Reichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISTL
21Shots on goal40
1.9Expected goals3.6
44Shot attempts71
28Faceoffs won32
1Power plays2
4Penalty minutes2
12Hits27
14Blocked shots14
25Giveaways14
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Teravainen – Mikheyev4:52

    xG 0.40–0.14 (74%)attempts 5–5goals 3–0

  2. Teravainen – Mikheyev – Nazar6:59

    xG 0.28–0.25 (53%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

  3. Bertuzzi – Kurashev – Nazar2:10

    xG 0.05–0.17 (22%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Maroon – Smith – Reichel9:08

    xG 0.27–0.40 (40%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodie – Del Mastro12:27

    xG 0.58–0.33 (64%)attempts 9–12goals 2–1

  2. Martinez – Jones20:04

    xG 0.55–1.16 (32%)attempts 18–27goals 2–2

  3. Murphy – Vlasic18:39

    xG 0.32–0.95 (25%)attempts 10–18goals 1–2

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBuchnevich – Kyrou – Thomas12:17

    xG 0.73–0.01 (99%)attempts 17–2goals 1–0

  2. Sundqvist – Neighbours – Bolduc6:30

    xG 0.23–0.14 (62%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway3:06

    xG 0.07–0.06 (51%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Faksa – Walker – Toropchenko9:05

    xG 0.28–0.29 (49%)attempts 8–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Parayko16:47

    xG 0.67–0.32 (68%)attempts 16–11goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Leddy15:45

    xG 0.72–0.42 (63%)attempts 18–13goals 2–1

  3. Faulk – Broberg12:58

    xG 0.22–0.64 (26%)attempts 10–10goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.6 xGCHI 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #14 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.21 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 78% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).