Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 25, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Anaheim Ducks 2, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 81% of the time.

BUF winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA151706218
BUF01107319337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:05ANAMason McTavishPPAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Troy Terry · Slap, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:58ANALeo CarlssonPPAssists: Pavel Mintyukov, Isac Lundeström · Slap, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P3 1:56BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Dylan Cozens, Owen Power · Snap, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:34BUFAlex TuchAssists: Dylan Cozens · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:31BUFHenri JokiharjuGWGAssists: Jack Quinn, Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:46BUFJordan Greenway: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 2:39BUFRasmus Dahlin: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 12:42ANAPavel Mintyukov: Interference2 min
  4. P1 15:54BUFPeyton Krebs: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 15:54ANAJacob Trouba: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 16:33BUFJJ Peterka: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P1 18:06ANARyan Strome: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 18:06BUFMattias Samuelsson: Roughing2 min
  9. P1 18:06ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  10. P1 18:06ANARyan Strome: Fighting5 min
  11. P1 18:06BUFPeyton Krebs: Fighting5 min
  12. P2 3:13BUFAlex Tuch: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P2 13:44ANAJacob Trouba: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00McLeod won the faceoff against Carlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANABUF
18Shots on goal37
3.0Expected goals5.2
43Shot attempts84
29Faceoffs won38
4Power plays3
15Penalty minutes17
26Hits33
18Blocked shots11
15Giveaways12
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Killorn – McTavish – Carlsson11:51

    xG 0.30–0.62 (33%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

  2. Fabbri – Lundeström – Gauthier5:08

    xG 0.09–0.54 (14%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

  3. Johnston – Harkins – Leason6:58

    xG 0.05–0.81 (6%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

  4. Strome – Vatrano – Terry11:45

    xG 0.20–1.15 (15%)attempts 7–22goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Gudas – LaCombe15:14

    xG 0.26–0.60 (31%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

  2. Dumoulin – Helleson12:10

    xG 0.17–1.16 (13%)attempts 6–22goals 0–1

  3. Trouba – Mintyukov12:02

    xG 0.26–1.61 (14%)attempts 8–23goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka4:49

    xG 0.68–0.06 (92%)attempts 14–2goals 2–0

  2. Malenstyn – Krebs – Benson4:58

    xG 0.59–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Tuch – Greenway – Thompson4:57

    xG 0.52–0.08 (87%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  4. Greenway – Cozens – Quinn5:20

    xG 0.46–0.11 (80%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Byram17:15

    xG 1.71–0.31 (85%)attempts 28–10goals 0–0

  2. Gilbert – Jokiharju5:48

    xG 0.61–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

  3. Jokiharju – Power4:34

    xG 0.51–0.10 (83%)attempts 12–4goals 3–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 5.2 xGANA 3.0 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #400 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 81% of the time.

BUF winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).