Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 1, 2025·Ohio Stadium, ColumbusOutdoor game

Detroit Red Wings 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 68% of the time.

CBJ winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET014111221346
CBJ063728521

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:31CBJDenton MateychukAssists: Boone Jenner, James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 13:06DETAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Moritz Seider · Snap, 0.37 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:23CBJDmitri VoronkovPPAssists: Kent Johnson, Zach Werenski · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:55CBJMathieu OlivierAssists: Justin Danforth · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:34DETPatrick KaneAssists: Simon Edvinsson, Albert Johansson · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:36DETAlex DeBrincatAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:43CBJJustin DanforthGWGAssists: Zachary Aston-Reese, Ivan Provorov · Snap, 0.27 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:52CBJAdam FantilliENAssists: Zach Werenski, Boone Jenner · Wrist, 0.81 xG3–5
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 12:18CBJDante Fabbro: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P2 17:15DETMoritz Seider: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P3 5:27CBJKirill Marchenko: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
43% to win57% to win
← DET attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fantilli won the faceoff against Larkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETCBJ
46Shots on goal21
3.4Expected goals4.4
84Shot attempts45
28Faceoffs won29
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
31Hits25
14Blocked shots22
17Giveaways20
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestTarasenko – Veleno – Berggren3:17

    xG 0.44–0.00 (99%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Larkin – Raymond – Kasper17:03

    xG 0.80–0.43 (65%)attempts 25–15goals 0–0

  3. Motte – Fischer – Berggren4:45

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  4. Tarasenko – Veleno – Soderblom8:32

    xG 0.22–0.21 (51%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHoll – Gustafsson12:45

    xG 0.98–0.11 (90%)attempts 18–7goals 0–1

  2. Johansson – Edvinsson18:03

    xG 0.79–0.65 (55%)attempts 30–12goals 1–2

  3. Chiarot – Seider20:09

    xG 0.73–1.01 (42%)attempts 21–19goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestOlivier – Danforth – Aston-Reese11:23

    xG 0.60–0.30 (66%)attempts 9–12goals 2–0

  2. Marchenko – Voronkov – Fantilli14:27

    xG 0.81–0.52 (61%)attempts 17–19goals 0–0

  3. Kuraly – LaBate – Pyyhtia9:06

    xG 0.00–0.58 (0%)attempts 2–20goals 0–1

  4. van Riemsdyk – Jenner – Johnson11:29

    xG 0.34–1.02 (25%)attempts 7–21goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – Mateychuk14:24

    xG 0.86–0.44 (66%)attempts 9–22goals 2–1

  2. Werenski – Provorov2:49

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  3. Werenski – Fabbro21:44

    xG 0.93–1.23 (43%)attempts 20–28goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 4.4 xGDET 3.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #201 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.92 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 68% of the time.

CBJ winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).