Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 4, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

San Jose Sharks 6, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 77% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS01021147628
BUF0511116222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:01SJSTimothy LiljegrenAssists: William Eklund, Jake Walman · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:13BUFJJ PeterkaPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jack Quinn · Slap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 18:22SJSNico SturmAssists: Collin Graf, Klim Kostin · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:19SJSWilliam EklundGWGAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Shakir Mukhamadullin · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:55BUFTage ThompsonAssists: JJ Peterka, Connor Clifton · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:58SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Shakir Mukhamadullin, Will Smith · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P3 12:49SJSWill SmithAssists: Fabian Zetterlund · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–2
  8. P3 18:01SJSTyler ToffoliENAssists: Jake Walman, Timothy Liljegren · Wrist, 0.36 xG6–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 10:49BUFAlex Tuch: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 14:54BUFDylan Cozens: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 4:00SJSJack Thompson: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:16BUFRasmus Dahlin: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 9:16SJSLuke Kunin: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:32SJSBarclay Goodrow: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cozens won the faceoff against Sturm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSBUF
28Shots on goal22
3.4Expected goals1.8
64Shot attempts55
31Faceoffs won33
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
24Hits29
21Blocked shots14
16Giveaways14
9Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestZetterlund – Smith – Celebrini10:17

    xG 0.51–0.19 (72%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  2. Kostin – Sturm – Graf3:20

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

  3. Goodrow – Kunin – Sturm7:12

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Goodrow – Kunin – Dellandrea3:22

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWalman – Liljegren10:35

    xG 0.59–0.47 (56%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

  2. Vlasic – Thompson10:09

    xG 0.29–0.37 (44%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Ferraro – Mukhamadullin16:51

    xG 0.28–0.46 (38%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Greenway – Cozens8:08

    xG 0.62–0.52 (54%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Malenstyn – Krebs – Benson2:20

    xG 0.04–0.01 (82%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. McLeod – Quinn – Benson6:31

    xG 0.23–0.20 (53%)attempts 5–9goals 0–2

  4. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Krebs6:00

    xG 0.13–0.19 (40%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Samuelsson4:07

    xG 0.27–0.06 (83%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Dahlin – Power2:02

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Bryson – Power4:23

    xG 0.15–0.12 (56%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.8 xGSJS 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #552 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.54 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 77% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).