Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 10, 2025·Delta Center, Salt Lake City

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Utah Hockey Club 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Hockey Club win this game 72% of the time.

UTA winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TOR2131704022426
UTA04315010041333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:42TORWilliam NylanderPPAssists: Mitch Marner, Matthew Knies · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:38TORCalle JarnkrokPPAssists: Max Domi, Morgan Rielly · Slap, 0.17 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:48TORSimon BenoitAssists: David Kampf, Pontus Holmberg · Snap, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:14UTAMichael CarconeAssists: Josh Doan, Jack McBain · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:03UTANick SchmaltzAssists: Olli Maatta, Clayton Keller · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 12:11UTABarrett HaytonPPAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Dylan Guenther · Deflected, 0.15 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. UTA Nick Schmaltz stopped
  2. 2. TOR William Nylander stopped
  3. 3. UTA Logan Cooley stopped
  4. 4. TOR Auston Matthews scored
  5. 5. UTA Clayton Keller scored
  6. 6. TOR Mitch Marner scored
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:00TORBrandon Carlo: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:44UTAJosh Doan: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:18UTAIan Cole: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:08UTALiam O'Brien: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 4:54TORSimon Benoit: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 4:54UTAMichael Kesselring: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 11:55TORSimon Benoit: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 13:06TOROliver Ekman-Larsson: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P2 14:23TORScott Laughton: Cross checking2 min
  10. P2 19:06UTAAlexander Kerfoot: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 6:06TORJohn Tavares: Too many men on the ice2 min
  12. P3 6:22UTAClayton Keller: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0UTA
43% to win57% to win
← TOR attackUTA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Tavares won the faceoff against Hayton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORUTA
26Shots on goal33
2.8Expected goals4.2
49Shot attempts78
34Faceoffs won31
5Power plays5
15Penalty minutes15
21Hits22
23Blocked shots11
23Giveaways20
9Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestLorentz – Kampf – Holmberg6:50

    xG 0.17–0.08 (67%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Tavares – Jarnkrok – Nylander10:12

    xG 0.29–0.39 (42%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

  3. Laughton – Domi – McMann7:57

    xG 0.05–0.31 (14%)attempts 2–9goals 0–1

  4. Marner – Matthews – Knies8:39

    xG 0.18–0.48 (28%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Benoit6:44

    xG 0.14–0.07 (67%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Myers3:23

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Ekman-Larsson – McCabe11:37

    xG 0.29–0.39 (42%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

Utah Hockey Club

Forward lines

  1. bestKerfoot – Hayton – Guenther8:47

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 16–3goals 0–0

  2. O'Brien – Stenlund – Carcone4:59

    xG 0.25–0.09 (74%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Schmaltz – Keller – Cooley10:03

    xG 0.34–0.18 (65%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  4. Crouse – McBain – Doan8:07

    xG 0.18–0.18 (50%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMaatta – Durzi11:24

    xG 0.30–0.08 (80%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Maatta2:24

    xG 0.17–0.08 (68%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Kesselring8:49

    xG 0.33–0.25 (57%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

UTA 4.2 xGTOR 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

UTATOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

UTA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line UTA is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #140 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50UTA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Hockey Club win this game 72% of the time.

UTA winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (UTA − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).