Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 15, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Vegas Golden Knights 3, Buffalo Sabres 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 62% of the time.

BUF winsVGK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VGK171616001319
BUF012110214012437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:07VGKBrett HowdenAssists: Tanner Pearson, Ivan Barbashev · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 12:06VGKPavel DorofeyevAssists: Tomas Hertl · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P2 12:13BUFRyan McLeodAssists: Jacob Bryson, Bowen Byram · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P3 9:53BUFJason ZuckerPPUnassisted · Snap, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P3 17:27VGKJack EichelAssists: Mark Stone, Alex Pietrangelo · Backhand, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:46BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Bowen Byram, Tage Thompson · Slap, 0.04 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Tage Thompson stopped
  2. 2. VGK Victor Olofsson scored
  3. 3. BUF Jack Quinn scored
  4. 4. VGK Jack Eichel stopped
  5. 5. BUF Alex Tuch scored
  6. 6. VGK Pavel Dorofeyev stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 5:46VGKAdin Hill: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P2 9:25BUFPeyton Krebs: Instigator2 min
  3. P2 9:25BUFPeyton Krebs: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 9:25VGKBrett Howden: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 9:25BUFPeyton Krebs: Instigator misconduct10 min
  6. P2 11:47VGKKeegan Kolesar: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 11:47BUFJordan Greenway: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 9:36VGKPavel Dorofeyev: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VGK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← VGK attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VGKBUF
19Shots on goal37
1.9Expected goals2.5
49Shot attempts70
19Faceoffs won48
1Power plays2
14Penalty minutes22
22Hits36
14Blocked shots13
19Giveaways23
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vegas Golden Knights

Forward lines

  1. bestStone – Barbashev – Eichel5:52

    xG 0.29–0.06 (83%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

  2. Olofsson – Eichel – Kolesar2:27

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Olofsson – Eichel3:49

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  4. Smith – Olofsson – Roy4:11

    xG 0.20–0.09 (70%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHanifin – Whitecloud20:48

    xG 0.53–0.22 (71%)attempts 19–16goals 1–0

  2. Pietrangelo – Hague14:44

    xG 0.47–0.43 (52%)attempts 16–15goals 2–0

  3. McNabb – Korczak14:31

    xG 0.32–0.62 (34%)attempts 6–17goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – McLeod – Benson11:53

    xG 0.53–0.17 (76%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Kozak6:34

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Krebs – Quinn – Kulich5:03

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  4. Lafferty – Malenstyn – Krebs2:51

    xG 0.08–0.03 (73%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBryson – Byram14:08

    xG 0.59–0.30 (66%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Byram – Power2:08

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Clifton – Power12:52

    xG 0.28–0.27 (51%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.5 xGVGK 1.9 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFVGK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it VGK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #75 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.65 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
VGK 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +51 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 62% of the time.

BUF winsVGK wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − VGK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).