Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 11, 2025·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

St. Louis Blues 4, Calgary Flames 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL04212212428
CGY1911406229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:49CGYMatt CoronatoPPAssists: Joel Farabee, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:41STLJake NeighboursAssists: Robert Thomas, Pavel Buchnevich · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:25STLRobert ThomasPPAssists: Jimmy Snuggerud, Justin Faulk · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:57CGYMatt CoronatoAssists: Kevin Bahl · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:07STLJake NeighboursGWGAssists: Colton Parayko, Cam Fowler · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:33STLPius SuterAssists: Tyler Tucker, Nathan Walker · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:29STLNick Bjugstad: Holding2 min
  2. P1 4:54CGYBlake Coleman: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 10:28CGYConnor Zary: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 13:59STLPhilip Broberg: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 17:13STLPavel Buchnevich: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:24STLTyler Tucker: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 3:24CGYRyan Lomberg: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 3:50STLRobert Thomas: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 5:38STLColton Parayko: Holding2 min
  10. P2 13:34CGYMikael Backlund: Holding2 min · PPG
  11. P3 1:35STLPius Suter: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 4:50CGYNazem Kadri: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← STL attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Schenn won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCGY
28Shots on goal29
2.6Expected goals3.2
57Shot attempts66
36Faceoffs won25
4Power plays6
17Penalty minutes13
29Hits22
17Blocked shots21
13Giveaways11
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestWalker – Joseph – Suter2:08

    xG 0.56–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Kyrou – Holloway11:30

    xG 0.44–0.32 (58%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  3. Buchnevich – Thomas – Neighbours4:48

    xG 0.17–0.15 (53%)attempts 4–6goals 2–0

  4. Bjugstad – Walker – Joseph3:36

    xG 0.08–0.18 (32%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFaulk – Tucker2:24

    xG 0.54–0.00 (99%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Broberg – Mailloux2:44

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Parayko13:03

    xG 0.25–0.46 (36%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Honzek9:11

    xG 0.29–0.16 (64%)attempts 9–5goals 0–2

  2. Kadri – Coronato – Gridin9:44

    xG 0.35–0.26 (57%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  3. Lomberg – Zary – Klapka4:32

    xG 0.11–0.26 (30%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Frost – Farabee – Sharangovich7:52

    xG 0.53–0.96 (36%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Hanley12:32

    xG 0.94–0.45 (68%)attempts 20–10goals 0–3

  2. Pachal – Parekh9:40

    xG 0.42–0.50 (46%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  3. Andersson – Bahl12:44

    xG 0.41–0.70 (37%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.2 xGSTL 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 59/100 · #590 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.76 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).