Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 11, 2025·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Anaheim Ducks 7, San Jose Sharks 6 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 86% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA21421521411744
SJS273101600623

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:40SJSTyler ToffoliAssists: Will Smith, Macklin Celebrini · Slap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:12SJSRyan ReavesAssists: Adam Gaudette, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:53ANACutter GauthierAssists: Mason McTavish, Radko Gudas · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:14ANABeckett SenneckePPAssists: Mason McTavish, Olen Zellweger · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:21SJSMario FerraroAssists: Will Smith, Macklin Celebrini · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 6:19ANAAlex KillornAssists: Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P2 10:34SJSJohn KlingbergPPAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Will Smith · Slap, 0.19 xG3–4
  8. P2 17:14SJSAdam GaudettePPAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Dmitry Orlov · Slap, 0.16 xG3–5
  9. P2 19:29ANAChris KreiderPPAssists: Leo Carlsson, Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–5
  10. P3 5:34SJSJeff SkinnerAssists: Ty Dellandrea, Dmitry Orlov · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–6
  11. P3 10:29ANACutter GauthierAssists: Mason McTavish, Beckett Sennecke · Tip-in, 0.09 xG5–6
  12. P3 19:09ANAChris KreiderAssists: Leo Carlsson, Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.17 xG6–6
  13. OT 0:46ANALeo CarlssonGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.09 xG7–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 13:28SJSDmitry Orlov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:16SJSRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 15:16ANARoss Johnston: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:13SJSJohn Klingberg: Holding2 min
  5. P2 2:36SJSAdam Gaudette: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 8:54ANAOlen Zellweger: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 9:58ANAFrank Vatrano: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 12:53ANARyan Poehling: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  9. P2 16:35ANAMason McTavish: High sticking2 min · PPG
  10. P2 18:07SJSTimothy Liljegren: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Celebrini won the faceoff against McTavish
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASJS
44Shots on goal23
4.8Expected goals2.2
85Shot attempts43
24Faceoffs won33
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
24Hits20
12Blocked shots18
15Giveaways20
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMcTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke13:09

    xG 1.61–0.05 (97%)attempts 32–5goals 1–0

  2. Killorn – Granlund – Vatrano7:33

    xG 0.70–0.26 (73%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

  3. Killorn – Kreider – Carlsson3:04

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Kreider – Terry – Carlsson7:47

    xG 0.44–0.40 (52%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTrouba – Zellweger14:44

    xG 2.17–0.24 (90%)attempts 28–8goals 2–0

  2. Gudas – LaCombe13:50

    xG 0.30–0.12 (72%)attempts 18–9goals 0–1

  3. Helleson – Mintyukov10:27

    xG 0.21–0.53 (29%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestReaves – Goodrow – Gaudette4:52

    xG 0.19–0.03 (86%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  2. Goodrow – Dellandrea – Graf2:19

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  3. Skinner – Dellandrea – Graf6:58

    xG 0.23–0.59 (28%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

  4. Toffoli – Wennberg – Eklund10:06

    xG 0.31–0.70 (30%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ferraro – Liljegren14:06

    xG 0.38–0.54 (42%)attempts 11–22goals 1–0

  2. Orlov – Liljegren2:24

    xG 0.00–0.36 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  3. Orlov – Dickinson9:59

    xG 0.25–0.74 (25%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.2 xGANA 4.8 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #5 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.29 · 13 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 86% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).