Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 16, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

Carolina Hurricanes 4, Anaheim Ducks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 75% of the time.

ANA winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR11111229432
ANA0811006124

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:54CARSeth JarvisAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:22CARSeth JarvisPPGWGAssists: Jackson Blake, Shayne Gostisbehere · Slap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:32ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Alex Killorn, Drew Helleson · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:38CARAlexander NikishinAssists: Sebastian Aho, Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P3 15:48CARSebastian AhoAssists: Seth Jarvis · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–1
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 1:07ANARadko Gudas: Interference2 min
  2. P1 10:41ANAMason McTavish: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 3:22CARMark Jankowski: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 8:35ANAJackson LaCombe: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 0:00CARFrederik Andersen: Goalie leave crease2 min
  6. P2 0:00ANALukas Dostal: Goalie leave crease2 min
  7. P2 0:00CARK'Andre Miller: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  8. P2 0:00ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 0:00CARLogan Stankoven: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 5:42CARSebastian Aho: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 9:36CARJackson Blake: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 0:00CARJalen Chatfield: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← CAR attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00McTavish won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARANA
32Shots on goal24
3.8Expected goals2.2
62Shot attempts53
24Faceoffs won34
3Power plays4
14Penalty minutes10
19Hits31
16Blocked shots16
22Giveaways15
4Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestEhlers – Aho – Jarvis8:32

    xG 0.97–0.27 (78%)attempts 12–8goals 2–0

  2. Jankowski – Robinson – Svechnikov5:45

    xG 0.45–0.17 (73%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  3. Hall – Stankoven – Blake9:03

    xG 0.57–0.44 (57%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Martinook – Carrier10:53

    xG 0.44–0.52 (46%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestReilly – Chatfield13:05

    xG 1.34–0.61 (69%)attempts 20–14goals 1–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Nikishin11:41

    xG 0.83–0.32 (72%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  3. Walker – Miller14:31

    xG 0.62–0.63 (50%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Kreider – Carlsson10:00

    xG 0.73–0.43 (63%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  2. Granlund – Vatrano – Terry6:51

    xG 0.25–0.48 (34%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

  3. McTavish – Gauthier – Sennecke12:37

    xG 0.82–1.08 (43%)attempts 19–12goals 0–1

  4. Johnston – Poehling – Nesterenko6:08

    xG 0.04–0.56 (7%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Mintyukov3:47

    xG 0.44–0.28 (62%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Helleson – LaCombe4:31

    xG 0.34–0.35 (49%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

  3. Gudas – LaCombe8:54

    xG 0.30–0.72 (29%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.2 xGCAR 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #931 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 75% of the time.

ANA winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).