Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 19, 2025·Capital One Arena, Washington

Vancouver Canucks 4, Washington Capitals 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 72% of the time.

WSH winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN3121705424
WSH07112212331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:59VANElias PetterssonAssists: Conor Garland · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:11VANTyler MyersUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:52VANKiefer SherwoodPPAssists: Conor Garland, Quinn Hughes · Snap, 0.07 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:54VANTeddy BluegerGWGAssists: Evander Kane, Tyler Myers · Snap, 0.16 xG4–0
  5. P2 13:42WSHRyan LeonardPPAssists: Tom Wilson, Dylan Strome · Snap, 0.15 xG4–1
  6. P3 9:01WSHJakob ChychrunAssists: Hendrix Lapierre, Rasmus Sandin · Snap, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:46WSHJohn CarlsonAssists: Dylan Strome, Tom Wilson · Snap, 0.04 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 10:23VANFilip Chytil: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 17:11WSHAlex Ovechkin: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:36WSHDylan Strome: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:13WSHBrandon Duhaime: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 6:13VANVictor Mancini: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 9:56VANEvander Kane: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 12:13VANArshdeep Bains: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  8. P2 0:00WSHNic Dowd: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 5:45VANFilip Hronek: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 14:35WSHJustin Sourdif: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Blueger
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANWSH
24Shots on goal31
2.6Expected goals4.1
37Shot attempts84
23Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
22Hits28
23Blocked shots1
17Giveaways19
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Kane – Chytil – Lekkerimäki3:18

    xG 0.14–0.10 (58%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Blueger – Sherwood2:41

    xG 0.16–0.18 (47%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

  3. Blueger – Sherwood – O'Connor8:43

    xG 0.12–0.21 (36%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Karlsson – Bains – Sasson7:48

    xG 0.15–0.48 (24%)attempts 3–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Hughes4:48

    xG 0.71–0.36 (66%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  2. Myers – Pettersson6:48

    xG 0.24–0.22 (52%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  3. Pettersson – Mancini2:21

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestWilson – McMichael – Lapierre3:21

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Dowd – Beauvillier – Duhaime2:30

    xG 0.21–0.06 (79%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Ovechkin – Strome – Beauvillier6:04

    xG 0.35–0.20 (64%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Protas – Sourdif – Leonard4:37

    xG 0.25–0.10 (71%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Chychrun7:08

    xG 0.49–0.02 (96%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Roy – Sandin8:47

    xG 0.56–0.24 (70%)attempts 21–4goals 0–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Fehérváry2:27

    xG 0.25–0.06 (81%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 4.1 xGVAN 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #284 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.94 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 72% of the time.

WSH winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).