Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 6, 2025·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Washington Capitals 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH0731508330
PIT2161728531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:22PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Ben Kindel, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:32PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:08PITAnthony ManthaAssists: Tommy Novak, Blake Lizotte · Backhand, 0.17 xG0–3
  4. P2 9:41WSHDylan StromeAssists: Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:55WSHRasmus SandinAssists: Dylan Strome, Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:55WSHTom WilsonAssists: Dylan Strome, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P3 11:16PITBryan RustPPGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Ben Kindel · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:56PITConnor DewarENAssists: Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.42 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:05WSHConnor McMichael: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:33WSHSonny Milano: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:54PITBlake Lizotte: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 16:07WSHTrevor van Riemsdyk: Interference2 min
  5. P2 2:23WSHTrevor van Riemsdyk: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 4:43PITConnor Clifton: Interference2 min
  7. P3 8:39PITBen Kindel: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P3 9:24WSHDylan Strome: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← WSH attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against McMichael
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHPIT
30Shots on goal31
2.7Expected goals3.8
59Shot attempts67
31Faceoffs won29
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
27Hits10
15Blocked shots16
17Giveaways18
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOvechkin – Strome – Beauvillier12:16

    xG 1.39–0.35 (80%)attempts 23–9goals 2–0

  2. Wilson – McMichael – Protas7:05

    xG 0.27–0.28 (49%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  3. Dowd – Duhaime – Sourdif4:02

    xG 0.05–0.09 (37%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Milano – Lapierre – Leonard6:09

    xG 0.08–0.14 (37%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Chychrun3:13

    xG 0.62–0.03 (96%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Carlson – Fehérváry8:46

    xG 0.68–0.40 (63%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  3. van Riemsdyk – Sandin7:32

    xG 0.46–0.27 (63%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Heinen – Dewar – Lizotte2:40

    xG 0.16–0.16 (50%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Heinen – Tomasino – Koivunen4:48

    xG 0.00–0.12 (4%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Koppanen – Dewar – Lizotte5:35

    xG 0.46–0.58 (45%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Mantha – Novak7:45

    xG 0.04–0.47 (8%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Graves13:49

    xG 0.90–0.52 (64%)attempts 20–10goals 1–1

  2. Karlsson – Wotherspoon12:32

    xG 0.46–0.37 (55%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Shea14:06

    xG 0.55–1.50 (27%)attempts 15–27goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.8 xGWSH 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #150 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.72 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).