Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 8, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Colorado Avalanche 9, Edmonton Oilers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 75% of the time.

EDM winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL29412313934
EDM0611008124

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:29COLCale MakarAssists: Devon Toews, Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:35COLCale MakarGWGAssists: Devon Toews, Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:38COLGavin BrindleyAssists: Sam Malinski, Zakhar Bardakov · Backhand, 0.07 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:45COLJack DruryAssists: Brent Burns, Victor Olofsson · Tip-in, 0.06 xG4–0
  5. P2 9:34COLParker KellyAssists: Gavin Brindley, Zakhar Bardakov · Backhand, 0.10 xG5–0
  6. P2 11:30EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Snap, 0.10 xG5–1
  7. P2 14:38COLParker KellySHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG6–1
  8. P3 0:24COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Artturi Lehkonen, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.11 xG7–1
  9. P3 5:02COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Ross Colton · Snap, 0.05 xG8–1
  10. P3 14:28COLJack DruryAssists: Ross Colton, Parker Kelly · Snap, 0.13 xG9–1
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 4:17COLMartin Necas: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 6:43EDMDarnell Nurse: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 8:39COLGavin Brindley: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 9:09EDMJack Roslovic: Interference2 min
  5. P1 16:45EDMConnor McDavid: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 18:09EDMJake Walman: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 11:23COLJosh Manson: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 11:45EDMVasily Podkolzin: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 14:31COLGabriel Landeskog: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 2:55COLNathan MacKinnon: Interference2 min
  11. P3 10:13EDMJake Walman: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 10:13EDMJake Walman: Abuse of officials2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLEDM
34Shots on goal24
4.1Expected goals2.5
59Shot attempts52
28Faceoffs won34
7Power plays5
10Penalty minutes14
7Hits13
14Blocked shots16
23Giveaways10
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKelly – Bardakov – Brindley4:56

    xG 0.32–0.01 (96%)attempts 9–2goals 2–0

  2. Landeskog – Olofsson – Drury9:36

    xG 0.33–0.10 (77%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  3. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas10:00

    xG 0.67–0.53 (56%)attempts 8–17goals 3–0

  4. Nelson – Nichushkin – Colton7:58

    xG 0.30–0.81 (27%)attempts 6–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAhcan – Malinski7:37

    xG 0.68–0.05 (93%)attempts 12–2goals 3–0

  2. Manson – Malinski2:17

    xG 0.05–0.01 (79%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  3. Burns – Ahcan2:51

    xG 0.06–0.03 (67%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Howard – Savoie – Tomasek7:07

    xG 0.16–0.13 (56%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Draisaitl – McDavid – Roslovic11:09

    xG 1.04–1.04 (50%)attempts 21–10goals 0–2

  3. Henrique – Frederic – Philp3:39

    xG 0.12–0.23 (34%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

  4. Frederic – Philp – Podkolzin2:59

    xG 0.01–0.13 (8%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard13:16

    xG 1.28–0.68 (65%)attempts 27–7goals 0–2

  2. Kulak – Nurse2:07

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–1

  3. Kulak – Walman7:04

    xG 0.18–0.39 (32%)attempts 9–4goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.5 xGCOL 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #1156 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.67 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 75% of the time.

EDM winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).