Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 13, 2025·Ball Arena, Denver

Buffalo Sabres 3, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 85% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF261807321
COL36112216634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:52COLMartin NecasAssists: Cale Makar, Devon Toews · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:10COLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Sam Malinski, Martin Necas · Snap, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:47BUFBowen ByramAssists: Tage Thompson, Alex Tuch · Snap, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P1 9:46COLBrock NelsonAssists: Ross Colton, Gavin Brindley · Snap, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P1 13:28BUFJordan GreenwayAssists: Owen Power, Josh Doan · Slap, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:56BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Isak Rosen, Peyton Krebs · Slap, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P2 16:22COLGavin BrindleyGWGAssists: Josh Manson, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:53COLMartin NecasAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Samuel Girard · Snap, 0.17 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:11COLGabriel LandeskogENAssists: Martin Necas · Snap, 0.80 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 19:07COLRoss Colton: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  2. P2 6:30COLGabriel Landeskog: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 8:45BUFOwen Power: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 13:50COLNathan MacKinnon: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 3:01BUFTyson Kozak: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 14:14COLParker Kelly: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nelson won the faceoff against Kozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCOL
21Shots on goal34
2.5Expected goals5.0
55Shot attempts72
26Faceoffs won38
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
16Hits22
11Blocked shots13
23Giveaways13
9Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – McLeod10:44

    xG 0.65–0.59 (53%)attempts 13–13goals 1–1

  2. Quinn – Rosen – Ostlund10:10

    xG 0.39–0.43 (48%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Greenway – Doan – Kozak10:38

    xG 0.21–0.49 (30%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

  4. Malenstyn – Krebs – Dunne9:01

    xG 0.17–0.51 (25%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Samuelsson – Power12:46

    xG 0.62–0.57 (52%)attempts 15–11goals 1–2

  2. Samuelsson – Kesselring2:14

    xG 0.00–0.00 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Kesselring – Power2:08

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas13:56

    xG 1.09–0.62 (64%)attempts 18–15goals 3–0

  2. Nelson – Colton – Brindley9:45

    xG 0.39–0.28 (58%)attempts 9–8goals 2–1

  3. Landeskog – Olofsson – Drury7:19

    xG 0.41–0.38 (52%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  4. Kelly – Bardakov – Makar5:19

    xG 0.27–0.25 (52%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar14:55

    xG 1.00–0.26 (79%)attempts 21–7goals 1–0

  2. Girard – Malinski13:00

    xG 0.99–0.71 (58%)attempts 18–14goals 3–2

  3. Burns – Manson12:32

    xG 0.36–0.34 (52%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 5.0 xGBUF 2.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #244 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 85% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).