Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 4, 2025·Benchmark International Arena, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT18211112431
TBL01519216340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:12PITVille KoivunenPPAssists: Kris Letang, Tommy Novak · Snap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:53PITEvgeni MalkinUnassisted · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:49PITBen KindelPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–0
  4. P2 18:46TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Darren Raddysh, Jake Guentzel · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 1:17TBLBrandon HagelPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Darren Raddysh · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:44TBLBrandon HagelAssists: Nick Paul, Gage Goncalves · Snap, 0.22 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:17PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Tommy Novak, Anthony Mantha · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:36TBLCurtis Douglas: Fighting5 min · PPG
  2. P1 2:36PITBokondji Imama: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 4:59TBLMax Crozier: Holding2 min
  4. P1 11:14PITParker Wotherspoon: Holding2 min
  5. P1 13:58PITRyan Graves: Slashing2 min
  6. P1 19:36PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 9:13TBLDarren Raddysh: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 10:16TBLDeclan Carlile: Interference2 min
  9. P2 14:02PITErik Karlsson: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 1:02PITKris Letang: Tripping2 min · PPG
  11. P3 3:18PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 7:00TBLCharle-Edouard D'Astous: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Gourde
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
31Shots on goal40
2.8Expected goals4.6
51Shot attempts73
32Faceoffs won27
4Power plays6
17Penalty minutes13
21Hits13
14Blocked shots4
13Giveaways20
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Hayes – Rust10:00

    xG 0.65–0.34 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  2. Crosby – Koivunen – McGroarty2:21

    xG 0.09–0.01 (87%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Imama – Dewar – Lizotte4:17

    xG 0.13–0.09 (59%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Mantha – Novak8:08

    xG 0.52–0.51 (51%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Wotherspoon11:20

    xG 0.85–0.51 (63%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  2. Letang – Shea10:22

    xG 0.59–0.56 (51%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  3. Wotherspoon – Shea2:47

    xG 0.15–0.12 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Cirelli – Hagel5:05

    xG 0.69–0.28 (71%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  2. Guentzel – Bjorkstrand – Paul3:08

    xG 0.01–0.02 (40%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Kucherov – Guentzel – Cirelli4:54

    xG 0.17–0.34 (33%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1

  4. Gourde – Girgensons – Holmberg12:16

    xG 0.14–0.78 (16%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoser – Lilleberg3:42

    xG 0.12–0.03 (83%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. D'Astous – Crozier2:05

    xG 0.12–0.04 (72%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. D'Astous – Lilleberg8:49

    xG 0.80–0.74 (52%)attempts 8–9goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.6 xGPIT 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #183 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.82 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).