Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 9, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 4, Edmonton Oilers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF172140611428
EDM0801031200330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:01BUFJosh DoanPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Tage Thompson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 11:03BUFTage ThompsonUnassisted · Snap, 0.33 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:59BUFJosh DoanPPAssists: Tage Thompson, Rasmus Dahlin · Between legs, 0.17 xG3–0
  4. P3 0:10EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P3 1:56EDMVasily PodkolzinAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Ty Emberson · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:58EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:33BUFAlex TuchGWGAssists: Ryan McLeod, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.22 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 12:51EDMDarnell Nurse: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 18:28EDMDavid Tomasek: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:27BUFJack Quinn: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 11:19EDMZach Hyman: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:31BUFBeck Malenstyn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 7:51BUFRasmus Dahlin: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 12:51EDMZach Hyman: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 13:59EDMAdam Henrique: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 15:11BUFAlex Tuch: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 17:17EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Kozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
28Shots on goal30
2.9Expected goals3.0
53Shot attempts58
21Faceoffs won34
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
14Hits17
12Blocked shots15
10Giveaways14
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGreenway – Malenstyn – Dunne5:58

    xG 0.28–0.08 (78%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Tuch – Thompson – Krebs9:59

    xG 0.59–0.54 (52%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Doan – Kozak – Benson8:20

    xG 0.29–0.27 (52%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  4. McLeod – Quinn – Rosen6:23

    xG 0.28–0.53 (34%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Power4:02

    xG 0.33–0.18 (64%)attempts 1–6goals 1–0

  2. Bryson – Dahlin2:13

    xG 0.12–0.08 (60%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Dahlin – Byram2:25

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestDraisaitl – Podkolzin – Savoie9:41

    xG 0.41–0.17 (70%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid10:22

    xG 0.46–0.27 (63%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  3. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid3:16

    xG 0.28–0.09 (76%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Janmark – Mangiapane5:18

    xG 0.14–0.40 (26%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard15:25

    xG 1.07–0.63 (63%)attempts 18–7goals 1–1

  2. Kulak – Emberson9:16

    xG 0.16–0.04 (78%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Regula12:47

    xG 0.21–0.60 (26%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.0 xGBUF 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #100 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.13 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).