Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 18, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 64% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI11211015327
BUF14212212528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:40BUFJack QuinnAssists: Mattias Samuelsson, Zach Benson · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:38PHINoah CatesAssists: Bobby Brink · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:01PHICam YorkAssists: Trevor Zegras, Bobby Brink · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:54BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:30BUFNoah OstlundAssists: Owen Power, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 10:20BUFJosh NorrisPPGWGAssists: Zach Benson · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 14:28PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Emil Andrae, Jamie Drysdale · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:52BUFRyan McLeodENAssists: Mattias Samuelsson · Wrist, 0.79 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:18BUFRasmus Dahlin: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 19:23PHITravis Konecny: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 4:52BUFAlex Tuch: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 7:42PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 11:18PHIMatvei Michkov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P3 10:02PHIBobby Brink: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 15:19PHITrevor Zegras: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 17:41BUFMattias Samuelsson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
27Shots on goal28
2.6Expected goals3.5
57Shot attempts54
30Faceoffs won26
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
29Hits24
10Blocked shots15
9Giveaways25
1Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Konecny – Zegras10:23

    xG 0.81–0.45 (64%)attempts 15–9goals 1–2

  2. Cates – Brink – Michkov7:18

    xG 0.11–0.09 (55%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Konecny – Zegras – Brink2:06

    xG 0.11–0.12 (46%)attempts 1–3goals 1–0

  4. Couturier – Grundstrom – Tippett9:21

    xG 0.29–0.37 (44%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Ristolainen12:37

    xG 0.91–0.53 (63%)attempts 17–11goals 0–1

  2. Sanheim – York13:13

    xG 0.58–0.23 (71%)attempts 10–7goals 2–2

  3. Andrae – Drysdale14:34

    xG 0.69–0.38 (65%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestThompson – Krebs – Doan9:01

    xG 0.61–0.18 (77%)attempts 11–3goals 1–1

  2. Tuch – Norris – Ostlund9:54

    xG 0.33–0.34 (49%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Norris – Doan – Ostlund2:18

    xG 0.03–0.07 (31%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Tuch – Thompson – Krebs3:41

    xG 0.10–0.18 (37%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Dahlin11:10

    xG 0.69–0.00 (100%)attempts 13–2goals 1–0

  2. Timmins – Byram8:56

    xG 0.28–0.07 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Dahlin – Byram2:31

    xG 0.07–0.18 (28%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.5 xGPHI 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #409 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 64% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).