Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 7, 2026·Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles

San Jose Sharks 4, Los Angeles Kings 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.

LAK winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS061132712428
LAK081102701326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:10SJSTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Macklin Celebrini · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P2 11:34LAKAlex TurcotteAssists: Kevin Fiala · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P3 5:38SJSAdam GaudettePPAssists: Timothy Liljegren, Jeff Skinner · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:40LAKKevin FialaAssists: Alex Turcotte, Joel Edmundson · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 17:50LAKAlex LaferriereAssists: Joel Edmundson, Cody Ceci · Tip-in, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:53SJSMacklin CelebriniUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:08SJSWilliam EklundGWGAssists: Macklin Celebrini · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 16:39SJSVincent Iorio: Interference2 min
  2. P2 1:13SJSSam Dickinson: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 3:30LAKDrew Doughty: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  4. P2 5:07LAKSamuel Helenius: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 5:37SJSTyler Toffoli: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 17:49LAKDrew Doughty: Holding2 min
  7. P3 3:48LAKAdrian Kempe: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Turcotte won the faceoff against Ostapchuk
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSLAK
28Shots on goal26
4.3Expected goals3.2
60Shot attempts56
31Faceoffs won25
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
21Hits12
17Blocked shots14
17Giveaways18
8Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Wennberg – Regenda9:12

    xG 0.47–0.06 (89%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Skinner – Gaudette – Graf8:35

    xG 0.26–0.12 (68%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Eklund – Celebrini – Chernyshov12:08

    xG 0.72–0.90 (45%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  4. Reaves – Goodrow – Ostapchuk6:41

    xG 0.06–0.91 (6%)attempts 1–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Liljegren12:59

    xG 0.45–0.04 (91%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Leddy – Dickinson12:06

    xG 0.55–0.70 (44%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

  3. Ferraro – Liljegren2:44

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestFiala – Turcotte – Kuzmenko11:24

    xG 1.13–0.30 (79%)attempts 18–4goals 2–0

  2. Foegele – Byfield – Malott11:00

    xG 0.62–0.51 (55%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  3. Lee – Helenius – Ward2:20

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  4. Kempe – Laferriere – Ward5:06

    xG 0.30–0.39 (44%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Clarke13:59

    xG 1.10–0.12 (90%)attempts 21–2goals 2–0

  2. Doughty – Anderson14:20

    xG 0.56–0.44 (56%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

  3. Dumoulin – Ceci5:13

    xG 0.21–0.47 (32%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.2 xGSJS 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #97 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.68 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.

LAK winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).