Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 28, 2026·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 3, Calgary Flames 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 72% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN110114110334
CGY274917723

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:04CGYMatt CoronatoAssists: Zayne Parekh, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:59CGYJoel FarabeeAssists: Zach Whitecloud, Mikael Backlund · Tip-in, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:53VANLiam OhgrenAssists: Linus Karlsson, Elias Pettersson · Snap, 0.27 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:32CGYRyan StromeAssists: Olli Maatta, Yegor Sharangovich · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:36CGYOlli MaattaGWGAssists: Ryan Strome, Hunter Brzustewicz · Poke, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P2 4:47CGYMorgan FrostAssists: Matt Coronato, Matvei Gridin · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–5
  7. P2 13:36VANJake DeBruskPPAssists: Brock Boeser, Elias Pettersson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P2 19:23CGYZayne ParekhPPAssists: Matt Coronato, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–6
  9. P3 12:40VANNils HoglanderAssists: Victor Mancini, Zeev Buium · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–6
  10. P3 19:52CGYAdam KlapkaPPAssists: Brennan Othmann, Hunter Brzustewicz · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–7
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:59VANEvander Kane: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 4:17CGYAdam Klapka: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 4:17VANCurtis Douglas: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 7:15CGYYegor Sharangovich: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 12:25CGYKevin Bahl: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 18:24VANMarcus Pettersson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 10:37CGYZayne Parekh: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 17:07CGYKevin Bahl: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 18:23VANMarco Rossi: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pettersson won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
34Shots on goal23
3.2Expected goals1.9
61Shot attempts42
28Faceoffs won33
4Power plays3
11Penalty minutes13
32Hits18
12Blocked shots11
19Giveaways21
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPettersson – Karlsson – Ohgren13:06

    xG 0.83–0.15 (85%)attempts 17–7goals 1–1

  2. Boeser – O'Connor – Rossi11:55

    xG 0.57–0.20 (74%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  3. Kane – Blueger – DeBrusk4:30

    xG 0.37–0.12 (75%)attempts 8–3goals 0–2

  4. Kane – DeBrusk – Räty3:34

    xG 0.22–0.23 (49%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJoseph – Mancini9:53

    xG 1.41–0.17 (89%)attempts 20–4goals 1–1

  2. Pettersson – Mancini4:06

    xG 0.43–0.04 (91%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Joseph – Willander2:53

    xG 0.14–0.04 (77%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Olofsson – Sharangovich9:15

    xG 0.58–0.52 (53%)attempts 11–6goals 2–0

  2. Frost – Coronato – Gridin9:52

    xG 0.16–0.14 (54%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  3. Backlund – Coleman – Farabee9:34

    xG 0.07–0.33 (18%)attempts 3–12goals 1–0

  4. Othmann – Klapka – Gross6:09

    xG 0.28–0.60 (32%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMaatta – Brzustewicz14:41

    xG 0.68–0.27 (72%)attempts 14–7goals 2–0

  2. Pachal – Parekh10:07

    xG 0.31–1.04 (23%)attempts 7–19goals 0–0

  3. Whitecloud – Bahl16:52

    xG 0.24–1.05 (19%)attempts 9–16goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 1.9 xGVAN 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #693 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.88 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 72% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).