Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 4, 2026·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Florida Panthers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 9

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PIT winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA2706210423
PIT2961814931

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:20PITNoel AcciariAssists: Elmer Soderblom, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:06PITErik KarlssonPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Egor Chinakhov · Slap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:10FLAA.J. GreerAssists: Cole Reinhardt, Gustav Forsling · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P1 14:31FLASeth JonesAssists: Cole Schwindt · Slap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 1:51PITAnthony ManthaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P2 5:51PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P2 8:27PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Tommy Novak, Rickard Rakell · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–5
  8. P2 9:53PITElmer SoderblomAssists: Connor Dewar · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–6
  9. P2 17:48PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–7
  10. P2 18:07PITRyan SheaAssists: Samuel Girard, Anthony Mantha · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–8
  11. P3 3:30PITEvgeni MalkinUnassisted · Wrist, 0.26 xG2–9
  12. P3 8:02FLANoah GregorAssists: Sam Bennett, Matthew Tkachuk · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–9
  13. P3 10:46FLAMackie SamoskevichAssists: A.J. Greer · Snap, 0.07 xG4–9
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 4:12FLAMike Benning: Boarding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 4:26FLADonovan Sebrango: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 15:05FLALuke Kunin: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:05PITConnor Clifton: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 15:54FLAEetu Luostarinen: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAPIT
23Shots on goal31
1.5Expected goals3.3
41Shot attempts63
30Faceoffs won35
0Power plays3
11Penalty minutes5
18Hits10
14Blocked shots11
21Giveaways19
0Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. Kunin – Reinhardt – Schwindt10:46

    xG 0.12–0.36 (25%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  2. Verhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk12:40

    xG 0.20–0.50 (28%)attempts 8–12goals 0–2

  3. Nosek – Gregor – Boqvist11:50

    xG 0.14–0.50 (22%)attempts 4–14goals 0–2

  4. Greer – Luostarinen – Samoskevich12:52

    xG 0.61–1.05 (37%)attempts 15–13goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestForsling – Hovorka3:04

    xG 0.15–0.01 (92%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. Sebrango – Hovorka2:19

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Forsling – Benning14:13

    xG 0.58–0.54 (52%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Rakell – Novak11:54

    xG 1.46–0.40 (78%)attempts 23–5goals 2–2

  2. Acciari – Dewar – Soderblom11:32

    xG 0.67–0.16 (81%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Chinakhov10:59

    xG 0.24–0.30 (45%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Mantha – Brazeau – Kindel8:49

    xG 0.10–0.23 (30%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Girard17:23

    xG 0.99–0.48 (68%)attempts 15–14goals 2–1

  2. Karlsson – Wotherspoon16:17

    xG 0.75–0.38 (66%)attempts 16–13goals 2–0

  3. Clifton – Shea17:04

    xG 0.79–0.49 (62%)attempts 18–11goals 1–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.3 xGFLA 1.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #298 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PIT winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).