Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 4, 2026·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Winnipeg Jets 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 50% of the time.

CBJ winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WPG091918226
CBJ150308116

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:17CBJIvan ProvorovAssists: Mason Marchment, Kirill Marchenko · Snap, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:14WPGKyle ConnorAssists: Mark Scheifele, Neal Pionk · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P3 10:58WPGKyle ConnorGWGAssists: Mark Scheifele · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
Penalties (2)
  1. P2 10:53CBJDanton Heinen: Tripping2 min
  2. P3 19:51WPGMark Scheifele: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← WPG attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Scheifele
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGCBJ
26Shots on goal16
2.2Expected goals2.2
60Shot attempts50
9Faceoffs won24
1Power plays1
2Penalty minutes2
28Hits16
12Blocked shots16
17Giveaways11
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestScheifele – Connor – Iafallo16:09

    xG 0.78–0.47 (63%)attempts 16–10goals 2–0

  2. Toews – Koepke – Ford7:39

    xG 0.34–0.31 (52%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Barron – Rosen – Lambert8:25

    xG 0.15–0.42 (27%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  4. Lowry – Vilardi – Perfetti12:14

    xG 0.21–0.49 (30%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFleury – Bryson5:52

    xG 0.46–0.31 (60%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. DeMelo – Samberg2:20

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. DeMelo – Morrissey16:31

    xG 0.45–0.57 (44%)attempts 13–19goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestJenner – Monahan – Garland10:54

    xG 0.80–0.35 (69%)attempts 19–7goals 0–0

  2. Marchment – Marchenko – Fantilli11:27

    xG 0.57–0.55 (51%)attempts 11–15goals 1–1

  3. Coyle – Aston-Reese – Sillinger5:32

    xG 0.03–0.08 (30%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Coyle – Heinen – Sillinger7:13

    xG 0.07–0.23 (22%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProvorov – Fabbro14:23

    xG 1.11–0.44 (72%)attempts 19–13goals 1–0

  2. Gudbranson – Provorov3:39

    xG 0.01–0.17 (8%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  3. Gudbranson – Christiansen7:39

    xG 0.07–0.23 (22%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.2 xGWPG 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 21/100 · #1103 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 50% of the time.

CBJ winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).