- Age
- 55
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 92 kg
- Born
- Detroit, USA
- Draft
- 1990, round 2, #34 (NYR)
Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11
- Games
- 54
- Goals
- 3
- Points
- 26
- TOI per game
- 16:24
- xGF% (5v5)
- 43.1%
- Goals above expected
- −5.8
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
4th line
24th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.203rd pct
- Assists /601.5688th pct
- ixG /600.6026th pct
- Goals above expected−5.813th pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.1%11th pct
- CF% (5v5)45.1%11th pct
- Relative xGF%+0.251st pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.3413th pct
Usage
2nd line- TOI per game16:2463rd pct
- PP time share61.9%95th pct
- Offensive zone starts75.2%97th pct
- Quality of competition24.3%44th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Weight wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
48.1%
126–136 · below the 405 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
48.4%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
−4
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
5.3
262 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone52.5% 42–38
- Neutral zone47.7% 53–58
- Defensive zone43.7% 31–40
By strength
- Even strength47.2% 116–130
- Power play61.5% 8–5
- Shorthanded50.0% 1–1
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +19 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Claude Giroux54.5% 6–5
- Blair Betts44.4% 4–5
- Marty Reasoner50.0% 4–4
- Rod Brind'Amour50.0% 4–4
- Dominic Moore42.9% 3–4
- Scott Gomez42.9% 3–4
- Tomas Plekanec42.9% 3–4
- Chris Kelly66.7% 4–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 152 | 45.4% | 45.8% |
| 2010–11 | 110 | 51.8% | 51.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−5.8 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games