Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #17

Rod Brind'Amour

Age
56
Shoots
Left
Height
185 cm
Weight
93 kg
Born
Ottawa, CAN
Draft
1988, round 1, #9 (STL)

2009–10

Games
80
Goals
9
Points
19
TOI per game
12:43
xGF% (5v5)
–
Goals above expected
−1.6

Season

The regular-season line, by team for traded players.

2009–10CAR8091019−2912:43959.5%410.6–

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.51020304050607080
10m15m20m1020304050607080Game

Player card

How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.

Scoring

  • Goals /600.53
  • Assists /600.59
  • ixG /600.63
  • Goals above expected−1.6

Play-driving

  • xGF% (5v5)–
  • CF% (5v5)–
  • Relative xGF%–
  • Penalty diff /60-0.18

Usage

  • TOI per game12:43
  • PP time share–
  • Offensive zone starts–
  • Quality of competition–

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often Brind'Amour wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 202+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

58.8%

499–349 · #7 of 163 regulars, 96th percentile

Against an average centre

59.3%

Opponents won 50.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.5% against them.

Wins above average

+79

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

10.6

848 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

58%103 · +2.660%164 · +2.653%153 · +0.758%36 · +0.962%37 · −0.863%38 · −0.864%36 · 0.062%156 · +1.758%125 · 0.0Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone58.7% 183–129
  • Neutral zone60.2% 150–99
  • Defensive zone57.8% 166–121

By strength

  • Even strength59.0% 365–254
  • Power play62.3% 81–49
  • Shorthanded52.6% 50–45

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +12 after a win, −6 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−1.6 goals above expected

0246810121020304050607080Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−100+10+20+30