- Age
- 46
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 193 cm
- Weight
- 102 kg
- Born
- Pittsburgh, USA
- Draft
- 1999, round 4, #115 (PIT)
Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15
- Games
- 6
- Goals
- 0
- Points
- 0
- TOI per game
- 10:02
- xGF% (5v5)
- 49.2%
- Goals above expected
- −0.7
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd line
63rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
1st line- Goals /600.8978th pct
- Assists /601.2176th pct
- ixG /600.9184th pct
- Goals above expected−1.646th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)49.2%48th pct
- CF% (5v5)49.5%50th pct
- Relative xGF%−1.938th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.1325th pct
Usage
2nd line- TOI per game16:0572nd pct
- PP time share43.4%79th pct
- Offensive zone starts62.1%68th pct
- Quality of competition24.4%62nd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Malone wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
38.4%
134–215 · below the 1134 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
39.3%
Opponents won 50.9% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.1% against them.
Wins above average
−37
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
2.2
349 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone32.9% 53–108
- Neutral zone44.4% 48–60
- Defensive zone41.3% 33–47
By strength
- Even strength35.2% 69–127
- Power play48.0% 48–52
- Shorthanded34.0% 17–33
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +25 after a win, −9 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- David Steckel30.8% 4–9
- Patrice Bergeron10.0% 1–9
- Marty Reasoner37.5% 3–5
- David Krejci37.5% 3–5
- Brian Boyle37.5% 3–5
- Stephen Weiss37.5% 3–5
- Frans Nielsen16.7% 1–5
- Brandon Sutter66.7% 4–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 96 | 38.5% | 39.9% |
| 2010–11 | 143 | 39.2% | 39.9% |
| 2011–12 | 79 | 36.7% | 37.4% |
| 2012–13 | 23 | 39.1% | 39.4% |
| 2013–14 | 7 | 28.6% | 30.6% |
| 2014–15 | 1 | 100.0% | 97.4% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.7 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games