Skip to content
Ice Lab

Left wing · #23

Jeff Taffe

Age
45
Shoots
Left
Height
191 cm
Weight
94 kg
Born
Hastings, USA
Draft
2000, round 1, #30 (STL)

Career · 2009–10 to 2011–12

Games
27
Goals
1
Points
4
TOI per game
9:05
xGF% (5v5)
23.6%
Goals above expected
−2.1

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10FLA21112−18:25185.6%01.9–
2010–11CHI100004:050–00.00.0%
2011–12MIN5022+212:5570.0%01.223.9%
Total3 teams27134+19:05254.0%03.123.6%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.3101214161820222426
8m8m9m9m10m10m11m11m101214161820222426Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2011–12 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

17th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.246th pct
  • Assists /600.7330th pct
  • ixG /600.7557th pct
  • Goals above expected−2.138th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)23.6%0th pct
  • CF% (5v5)33.6%0th pct
  • Relative xGF%−14.80th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.4983rd pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game9:058th pct
  • PP time share28.4%58th pct
  • Offensive zone starts51.7%35th pct
  • Quality of competition24.5%56th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.

Most similar players this season

Needs a regular role to compare.

Faceoffs

How often Taffe wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2011–12, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 610+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

42.9%

36–48 · below the 610 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

43.4%

Opponents won 50.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.5% against them.

Wins above average

−6

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

3.8

84 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

53%19 · +0.345%11 · −0.350%10 · −1.033%3 · 0.050%4 · +1.150%4 · +4.620%5 · +3.831%16 · +0.442%12 · +1.1Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone47.6% 10–11
  • Neutral zone45.7% 16–19
  • Defensive zone35.7% 10–18

By strength

  • Even strength44.3% 35–44
  • Power play20.0% 1–4

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +3 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.9 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–107345.2%45.6%
2010–11540.0%43.1%
2011–12616.7%16.7%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−2.1 goals above expected

0123510152025Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60+80