- Age
- 44
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 178 cm
- Weight
- 82 kg
- Born
- Fraser, USA
- Draft
- Undrafted
Career · 2009–10 to 2012–13
- Games
- 240
- Goals
- 48
- Points
- 95
- TOI per game
- 15:41
- xGF% (5v5)
- 49.5%
- Goals above expected
- −12.6
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2012–13 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
51st percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd line- Goals /600.7660th pct
- Assists /600.7533rd pct
- ixG /600.9786th pct
- Goals above expected−12.64th pct
Play-driving
3rd line- xGF% (5v5)49.5%48th pct
- CF% (5v5)50.6%63rd pct
- Relative xGF%+2.675th pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.0831st pct
Usage
2nd line- TOI per game15:4165th pct
- PP time share18.4%49th pct
- Offensive zone starts53.4%38th pct
- Quality of competition24.4%57th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often LaRose wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2012–13, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
36.4%
40–70 · below the 727 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
36.9%
Opponents won 50.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.5% against them.
Wins above average
−14
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
1.4
110 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone34.6% 18–34
- Neutral zone37.0% 10–17
- Defensive zone38.7% 12–19
By strength
- Even strength34.6% 27–51
- Power play47.1% 8–9
- Shorthanded33.3% 5–10
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +20 after a win, −3 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.4 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Dominic Moore50.0% 2–2
- Jim Slater75.0% 3–1
- Steven Stamkos33.3% 1–2
- Paul Gaustad0.0% 0–3
- Stephen Weiss33.3% 1–2
- Paul Stastny33.3% 1–2
- Alexander Burmistrov33.3% 1–2
- Vincent Lecavalier66.7% 2–1
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 12 | 16.7% | 16.8% |
| 2010–11 | 33 | 33.3% | 34.5% |
| 2011–12 | 43 | 41.9% | 42.8% |
| 2012–13 | 22 | 40.9% | 39.8% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−12.6 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games