Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #8

Joe Colborne

Age
36
Shoots
Left
Height
196 cm
Weight
100 kg
Born
Calgary, CAN
Draft
2008, round 1, #16 (BOS)

Career · 2010–11 to 2016–17

Games
295
Goals
42
Points
114
TOI per game
13:54
xGF% (5v5)
44.9%
Goals above expected
+5.3

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2010–11TOR1011+118:4110.0%00.031.5%
2011–12TOR10145+213:41714.3%00.540.1%
2012–13TOR5000−19:0740.0%00.242.1%
2013–14CGY80101828−1714:168012.5%410.145.2%
2014–15CGY6482028+715:256711.9%58.543.8%
2015–16CGY73192544−915:1010019.0%511.747.6%
2016–17COL62448−2110:42488.3%35.842.4%
Total3 teams2954272114−3813:5430713.7%1736.744.9%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.511.550100150200250
8m10m12m14m16m18m20m50100150200250Game

Player card

How 2010–11 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

4th line

34th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd line
  • Goals /600.6147th pct
  • Assists /601.0568th pct
  • ixG /600.5425th pct
  • Goals above expected+5.382nd pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)44.9%16th pct
  • CF% (5v5)45.8%19th pct
  • Relative xGF%−2.135th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.3413th pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game13:5455th pct
  • PP time share27.0%61st pct
  • Offensive zone starts57.8%54th pct
  • Quality of competition23.8%40th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Colborne wins the draw over 2010–11 to 2016–17, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1337+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

48.6%

566–599 · below the 1337 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

48.8%

Opponents won 50.2% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.8% against them.

Wins above average

−14

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

5.4

1,165 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

42%126 · +0.755%295 · +2.143%203 · +2.462%53 · +3.644%45 · +0.751%51 · −0.129%41 · +2.158%205 · +0.438%146 · +0.8Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone49.8% 248–250
  • Neutral zone45.6% 144–172
  • Defensive zone49.6% 174–177

By strength

  • Even strength47.7% 458–502
  • Power play52.4% 89–81
  • Shorthanded54.3% 19–16

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +15 after a win, −11 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2010–11933.3%30.9%
2011–127835.9%35.9%
2012–132951.7%50.9%
2013–1444148.5%48.7%
2014–1533652.4%52.4%
2015–1615554.8%55.8%
2016–1711738.5%38.8%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+5.3 goals above expected

01020304050100150200250Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−60−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120