- Age
- 35
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 183 cm
- Weight
- 83 kg
- Born
- Sundsvall, SWE
- Draft
- 2009, round 2, #40 (EDM)
Career · 2011–12 to 2016–17
- Games
- 215
- Goals
- 10
- Points
- 35
- TOI per game
- 12:07
- xGF% (5v5)
- 44.4%
- Goals above expected
- −11.4
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2011–12 to 2016–17 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
15th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.238th pct
- Assists /600.5824th pct
- ixG /600.4919th pct
- Goals above expected−11.46th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)44.4%15th pct
- CF% (5v5)46.6%26th pct
- Relative xGF%−2.534th pct
- Penalty diff /600.1456th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game12:0737th pct
- PP time share14.7%48th pct
- Offensive zone starts40.9%17th pct
- Quality of competition23.2%22nd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Faceoffs
How often Lander wins the draw over 2011–12 to 2016–17, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
50.4%
930–914 · #87 of 186 regulars, 53rd percentile
Against an average centre
50.8%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
+14
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
8.8
1,844 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone52.8% 269–240
- Neutral zone50.2% 296–294
- Defensive zone49.0% 365–380
By strength
- Even strength51.7% 759–709
- Power play53.8% 56–48
- Shorthanded42.3% 115–157
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +13 after a win, −20 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Ryan Getzlaf60.0% 21–14
- Ryan O'Reilly44.1% 15–19
- Matt Stajan48.5% 16–17
- Anze Kopitar42.4% 14–19
- Paul Stastny50.0% 15–15
- Jason Spezza53.3% 16–14
- David Legwand48.0% 12–13
- Jarret Stoll52.0% 13–12
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011–12 | 344 | 43.3% | 43.8% |
| 2012–13 | 55 | 49.1% | 49.5% |
| 2013–14 | 160 | 44.4% | 44.6% |
| 2014–15 | 451 | 50.1% | 50.4% |
| 2015–16 | 693 | 54.5% | 54.9% |
| 2016–17 | 141 | 56.0% | 55.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−11.4 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games