- Age
- 38
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 191 cm
- Weight
- 101 kg
- Born
- Kajaani, FIN
- Draft
- Undrafted
2015–16
- Games
- 44
- Goals
- 2
- Points
- 5
- TOI per game
- 12:32
- xGF% (5v5)
- 38.4%
- Goals above expected
- −0.5
Season
The regular-season line, by team for traded players.
| 2015–16 |   BOS | 44 | 2 | 3 | 5 | −6 | 12:32 | 35 | 5.7% | 0 | 2.5 | 38.4% |
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
2nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.227th pct
- Assists /600.339th pct
- ixG /600.280th pct
- Goals above expected−0.549th pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)38.4%1st pct
- CF% (5v5)42.2%4th pct
- Relative xGF%−10.92nd pct
- Penalty diff /60-0.2223rd pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game12:3229th pct
- PP time share3.1%22nd pct
- Offensive zone starts37.1%13th pct
- Quality of competition23.0%16th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Kemppainen wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 205+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
49.5%
227–232 · #88 of 174 regulars, 50th percentile
Against an average centre
49.1%
Opponents won 49.7% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.3% against them.
Wins above average
−4
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
10.4
459 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone50.8% 60–58
- Neutral zone48.6% 70–74
- Defensive zone49.2% 97–100
By strength
- Even strength50.4% 191–188
- Power play53.3% 8–7
- Shorthanded43.1% 28–37
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +7 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Mikael Granlund45.5% 5–6
- Byron Froese60.0% 6–4
- William Karlsson60.0% 6–4
- Gregory Campbell20.0% 2–8
- Vernon Fiddler77.8% 7–2
- Erik Haula55.6% 5–4
- Peter Holland44.4% 4–5
- Tyler Bozak66.7% 6–3
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.5 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games