Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
34
Shoots
Left
Height
188 cm
Weight
90 kg
Born
Ile Bizard, CAN
Draft
2010, round 3, #89 (PHI)

Career · 2013–14 to 2020–21

Games
15
Goals
0
Points
0
TOI per game
9:29
xGF% (5v5)
40.9%
Goals above expected
−0.6

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2013–14CBJ1701108:5460.0%00.540.0%
2014–15CBJ33145−810:12234.3%01.933.6%
2015–16CBJ8112+39:001010.0%01.556.4%
2016–17VAN68459−1211:01646.3%05.042.7%
2017–18VAN9000−49:4720.0%00.442.7%
2018–19MTL32055−411:13310.0%03.448.9%
2019–20ARI2000−210:0120.0%00.264.0%
2020–21ARI13000−79:2430.0%00.435.0%
Total4 teams18261622−3410:261414.3%013.342.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.010.020.030.040.050.06101112131415
8m9m9m10m10m101112131415Game

Player card

How 2013–14 to 2020–21 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

2nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

Extra / AHL
  • Goals /600.194th pct
  • Assists /600.5117th pct
  • ixG /600.427th pct
  • Goals above expected−7.316th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)42.8%9th pct
  • CF% (5v5)44.7%13th pct
  • Relative xGF%−5.613th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.1625th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game10:2617th pct
  • PP time share1.4%10th pct
  • Offensive zone starts42.1%19th pct
  • Quality of competition23.2%22nd pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Chaput wins the draw over 2013–14 to 2020–21, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1529+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

51.6%

646–606 · below the 1529 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

51.4%

Opponents won 49.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.2% against them.

Wins above average

+17

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

7.3

1,252 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

56%220 · +0.949%169 · +1.944%156 · +1.864%58 · −1.554%79 · +0.348%54 · +2.448%69 · +0.653%269 · +2.151%178 · 0.0Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone46.5% 151–174
  • Neutral zone54.8% 263–217
  • Defensive zone51.9% 232–215

By strength

  • Even strength52.2% 610–558
  • Power play42.9% 6–8
  • Shorthanded42.9% 30–40

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +9 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2013–149842.9%44.0%
2014–1529448.6%48.8%
2015–167565.3%63.5%
2016–1738552.7%51.9%
2017–187458.1%59.1%
2018–1924450.8%50.2%
2019–201353.8%53.7%
2020–216950.7%51.6%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−0.6 goals above expected

00.10.20.30.40.50.62468101214Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−60−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120