- Age
- 37
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 82 kg
- Born
- Paris, FRA
- Draft
- Undrafted
Career · 2010–11 to 2013–14
- Games
- 47
- Goals
- 7
- Points
- 11
- TOI per game
- 11:36
- xGF% (5v5)
- 53.0%
- Goals above expected
- −0.8
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2010–11 to 2013–14 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd line
65th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
3rd line- Goals /600.7765th pct
- Assists /600.4410th pct
- ixG /600.8677th pct
- Goals above expected−0.850th pct
Play-driving
1st line- xGF% (5v5)53.0%81st pct
- CF% (5v5)56.0%96th pct
- Relative xGF%+3.784th pct
- Penalty diff /600.2266th pct
Usage
4th line- TOI per game11:3628th pct
- PP time share28.0%58th pct
- Offensive zone starts81.6%100th pct
- Quality of competition23.3%22nd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Da Costa wins the draw over 2010–11 to 2013–14, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 727+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
41.6%
142–199 · below the 727 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
42.0%
Opponents won 50.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.7% against them.
Wins above average
−27
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
7.3
341 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone46.0% 69–81
- Neutral zone35.9% 47–84
- Defensive zone43.3% 26–34
By strength
- Even strength41.9% 117–162
- Power play39.7% 23–35
- Shorthanded66.7% 2–1
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +25 after a win, −9 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.4 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- David Steckel25.0% 3–9
- Kyle Brodziak58.3% 7–5
- Brian Boyle27.3% 3–8
- Tyler Bozak55.6% 5–4
- Mikhail Grabovski22.2% 2–7
- Nate Thompson55.6% 5–4
- Jarret Stoll50.0% 4–4
- Bryan Little28.6% 2–5
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–11 | 21 | 28.6% | 27.2% |
| 2011–12 | 177 | 36.7% | 37.0% |
| 2012–13 | 64 | 60.9% | 61.3% |
| 2013–14 | 79 | 40.5% | 41.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−0.8 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games