Western Conference · Pacific Division
Los Angeles Kings
2012–13·27–16–5·59 points·2nd in the Pacific, 5th in the Western·Clinched playoff spot
- Points
- 59#7
- Goal differential
- +17#7
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 55.7%#1
- Power play
- 19.9%#10
- Penalty kill
- 83.2%#10
- GSAx
- −3.2#19
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Kings. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 47 | 10 | 32 | 42 | +14 | 20:29 | 98 | 10.2% | 16 | 9.2 | +0.8 | 60.4% | |
| 48 | 11 | 22 | 33 | +15 | 16:59 | 142 | 7.7% | 6 | 15.0 | −4.0 | 62.8% | |
| 48 | 26 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 17:35 | 133 | 19.5% | 10 | 16.3 | +9.7 | 56.7% | |
| 48 | 12 | 20 | 32 | −8 | 16:21 | 82 | 14.6% | 15 | 9.6 | +2.4 | 51.9% | |
| 46 | 18 | 11 | 29 | +6 | 19:30 | 142 | 12.7% | 13 | 18.8 | −0.8 | 56.6% | |
| 48 | 6 | 19 | 25 | +5 | 22:18 | 79 | 7.6% | 8 | 4.0 | +2.0 | 55.0% | |
| 48 | 6 | 16 | 22 | +4 | 26:24 | 114 | 5.3% | 10 | 8.1 | −2.1 | 55.4% | |
| 48 | 7 | 11 | 18 | +1 | 16:31 | 73 | 9.6% | 5 | 6.6 | +0.4 | 54.8% | |
| 45 | 7 | 9 | 16 | +16 | 17:54 | 77 | 9.1% | 7 | 3.3 | +3.7 | 62.2% | |
| 48 | 7 | 7 | 14 | +1 | 10:36 | 56 | 12.5% | 0 | 6.3 | +0.7 | 53.5% | |
| 48 | 5 | 9 | 14 | +5 | 15:12 | 92 | 5.4% | 0 | 8.8 | −3.8 | 56.1% | |
| 33 | 2 | 12 | 14 | −2 | 12:42 | 61 | 3.3% | 1 | 5.6 | −3.6 | 54.3% | |
| 48 | 1 | 11 | 12 | −6 | 21:47 | 33 | 3.0% | 0 | 1.1 | −0.1 | 51.1% | |
| 47 | 4 | 6 | 10 | −3 | 12:45 | 60 | 6.7% | 0 | 5.7 | −1.7 | 55.7% | |
| 34 | 2 | 5 | 7 | −4 | 9:22 | 19 | 10.5% | 0 | 2.9 | −0.9 | 48.8% | |
| 44 | 2 | 4 | 6 | −5 | 8:28 | 23 | 8.7% | 0 | 2.5 | −0.5 | 44.8% | |
| 16 | 1 | 5 | 6 | +2 | 10:54 | 27 | 3.7% | 0 | 2.7 | −1.7 | 48.3% | |
| 11 | 0 | 5 | 5 | +2 | 13:46 | 20 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.8 | −1.8 | 61.3% | |
| 27 | 1 | 4 | 5 | −2 | 16:01 | 30 | 3.3% | 1 | 1.4 | −0.4 | 57.9% | |
| 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | +3 | 11:59 | 20 | 10.0% | 2 | 2.2 | −0.2 | 48.2% | |
| 20 | 1 | 3 | 4 | +3 | 14:28 | 20 | 5.0% | 1 | 1.1 | −0.1 | 62.4% | |
| 35 | 0 | 3 | 3 | +5 | 14:17 | 15 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.1 | −1.1 | 52.4% | |
| 12 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 21:16 | 12 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.5 | −0.5 | 51.6% | |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 15:17 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 54.2% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 37 | 36 | 18 | 13 | 4 | .902 | 2.45 | 1 | −7.1 | .716 | |
| 14 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 1 | .922 | 1.87 | 1 | +3.9 | .800 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Backup
39th percentile among qualified goalies, blending goaltending 75%, usage 25%.
- Starter
- Backup
- Third string / AHL
Goaltending
Backup- Save %.90218th pct
- GSAx−7.123rd pct
- GSAx /60-0.2031st pct
- High-danger SV%.71623rd pct
- Medium-danger SV%.84520th pct
- Low-danger SV%.97272nd pct
- Rebound control−0.0647th pct
- GAA (lower is better)2.4558th pct
Usage
Starter- Games started3666th pct
- Shots faced /6025.009th pct
- xG faced /602.2515th pct
Percentiles among goalies with 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.