Eastern Conference · Metropolitan Division
Philadelphia Flyers
2018–19·37–37–8·82 points·6th in the Metropolitan, 11th in the Eastern
- Points
- 82#22
- Goal differential
- −39#23
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 48.6%#18
- Power play
- 17.1%#23
- Penalty kill
- 78.5%#26
- GSAx
- −30.6#30
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Flyers. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 82 | 22 | 63 | 85 | +9 | 21:27 | 229 | 9.6% | 23 | 17.8 | +4.2 | 49.6% | |
| 80 | 33 | 43 | 76 | +2 | 22:08 | 223 | 14.8% | 17 | 29.9 | +3.1 | 52.5% | |
| 78 | 20 | 46 | 66 | −16 | 18:40 | 210 | 9.5% | 18 | 19.9 | +0.1 | 49.0% | |
| 82 | 24 | 25 | 49 | −4 | 15:16 | 182 | 13.2% | 8 | 17.7 | +6.3 | 47.1% | |
| 66 | 27 | 21 | 48 | −10 | 16:36 | 167 | 16.2% | 13 | 21.2 | +5.8 | 44.3% | |
| 78 | 9 | 28 | 37 | −20 | 19:40 | 180 | 5.0% | 14 | 9.3 | −0.3 | 50.0% | |
| 82 | 9 | 26 | 35 | −4 | 19:34 | 121 | 7.4% | 5 | 6.6 | +2.4 | 51.2% | |
| 81 | 17 | 16 | 33 | −9 | 13:45 | 162 | 10.5% | 3 | 19.7 | −2.7 | 53.2% | |
| 82 | 12 | 20 | 32 | −11 | 14:51 | 130 | 9.2% | 0 | 15.5 | −3.5 | 48.0% | |
| 72 | 13 | 18 | 31 | −8 | 15:05 | 115 | 11.3% | 2 | 15.6 | −2.6 | 47.9% | |
| 62 | 16 | 11 | 27 | −20 | 16:33 | 136 | 11.8% | 8 | 21.2 | −5.2 | 49.0% | |
| 82 | 7 | 19 | 26 | −16 | 25:07 | 145 | 4.8% | 2 | 8.7 | −1.7 | 48.8% | |
| 77 | 4 | 16 | 20 | +6 | 17:53 | 136 | 2.9% | 0 | 4.1 | −0.1 | 50.9% | |
| 82 | 5 | 15 | 20 | −3 | 16:57 | 86 | 5.8% | 0 | 4.7 | +0.3 | 44.0% | |
| 67 | 6 | 12 | 18 | −1 | 11:25 | 65 | 9.2% | 0 | 7.7 | −1.7 | 44.5% | |
| 42 | 5 | 6 | 11 | −6 | 12:08 | 53 | 9.4% | 0 | 6.6 | −1.6 | 54.8% | |
| 47 | 0 | 9 | 9 | −5 | 16:24 | 41 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.0 | −2.0 | 48.0% | |
| 28 | 3 | 6 | 9 | −5 | 13:57 | 33 | 9.1% | 2 | 3.8 | −0.8 | 58.8% | |
| 47 | 3 | 4 | 7 | −2 | 7:55 | 34 | 8.8% | 0 | 2.7 | +0.3 | 41.7% | |
| 19 | 2 | 4 | 6 | −6 | 12:03 | 32 | 6.3% | 0 | 3.2 | −1.2 | 42.4% | |
| 23 | 1 | 3 | 4 | −5 | 9:41 | 15 | 6.7% | 0 | 1.4 | −0.4 | 39.8% | |
| 27 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −7 | 9:07 | 17 | 5.9% | 0 | 1.4 | −0.4 | 48.3% | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9:20 | 10 | 10.0% | 0 | 0.8 | +0.2 | 34.1% | |
| 26 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +5 | 15:33 | 20 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.8 | −0.8 | 48.7% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −5 | 15:22 | 25 | 4.0% | 0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 39.1% | |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5:44 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.3 | −0.3 | 35.4% | |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 5:35 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 57.6% | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7:25 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 48.5% | |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −3 | 12:22 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 36.6% | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 12:33 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 49.2% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 31 | 30 | 16 | 13 | 1 | .917 | 2.83 | 0 | −2.0 | .777 | |
| 26 | 23 | 11 | 11 | 1 | .907 | 2.96 | 1 | −0.6 | .745 | |
| 12 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | .902 | 3.33 | 1 | −3.6 | .800 | |
| 11 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | .863 | 4.01 | 1 | −10.4 | .677 | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | .859 | 4.27 | 0 | −8.6 | .700 | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | .881 | 3.70 | 0 | −1.2 | .667 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .806 | 5.08 | 0 | −2.9 | .400 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .833 | 4.22 | 0 | −1.1 | .750 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
2nd pair
56th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd pair- Goals /600.2053rd pct
- Assists /600.5533rd pct
- ixG /600.2571st pct
- Shots /604.2243rd pct
Play-driving
3rd pair- xGF% (5v5)48.8%43rd pct
- CF% (5v5)47.7%24th pct
- Relative xGF%+0.553rd pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)2.5538th pct
Usage
1st pair- TOI per game25:0798th pct
- PP time share30.7%70th pct
- PK time share59.7%95th pct
- Quality of competition25.2%91st pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.