Eastern Conference · Atlantic Division

Tampa Bay Lightning

2023–24·45–29–8·98 points·4th in the Atlantic, 6th in the Eastern·Clinched playoff spot

Seasons

Points: 98#13
Goal differential: +21#12
xGF% (5v5, adj.): 50.5%#18
Power play: 28.6%#1
Penalty kill: 83.3%#5
GSAx: −26.3#31

Forward lines

Trios of forwards together at 5-on-5. Raise the minimum to see only the regular lines. A defenceman who played forward still counts as a defenceman.

Minimum 5v5 time together

40 of 40 lines


Kucherov – Point – Hagel	345:03	74	57.9%	57.7%	22	19
Stamkos – Kucherov – Point	303:40	59	50.4%	52.1%	16	20
Stamkos – Cirelli – Hagel	231:41	40	51.7%	49.0%	11	16
Kucherov – Duclair – Point	143:24	15	59.1%	53.5%	11	9
Paul – Cirelli – Hagel	136:04	35	53.4%	54.2%	10	9
Paul – Eyssimont – Chaffee	97:20	25	47.6%	51.0%	5	4
Kucherov – Paul – Point	96:37	51	39.6%	45.0%	6	3
Motte – Sheary – Eyssimont	96:00	21	50.9%	52.2%	1	2
Stamkos – Paul – Sheary	81:31	20	58.9%	51.2%	5	1
Glendening – Motte – Jeannot	80:34	26	44.6%	47.7%	0	0

Defence pairs

Model-based

Pairs of defencemen together at 5-on-5.

Minimum 5v5 time together

26 of 26 pairs


Hedman – Raddysh	575:50	77	53.7%	52.5%	30	25
Hedman – Perbix	389:15	70	49.1%	48.9%	25	17
de Haan – Raddysh	325:29	58	56.0%	53.3%	13	15
Hedman – Cernak	234:49	64	53.2%	53.2%	12	10
Cernak – Sergachev	234:12	31	45.6%	46.1%	8	14
de Haan – Perbix	231:59	50	56.9%	52.3%	7	10
Perbix – Lilleberg	231:15	33	45.1%	54.1%	6	13
Raddysh – Sergachev	209:50	33	50.2%	54.9%	4	14

Who plays with whom

Model-based

Linemates pull together. Drag the handles to watch combinations form and break up during the season; click a player to open their page.

Games 1–82 · Oct 10 to Apr 17

Forward Defence Pair xGF%: red below 50, blue aboveThicker lines, more time together. Showing pairs with 20+ shared minutes.

With or without you

Model-based

Every pair of regulars. Some players lift everyone they play with; others depend on a particular partner.

	Sergachev	Cernak	Hagel	Cirelli	Stamkos	Raddysh	Hedman	Kucherov	Point	de Haan	Eyssimont	Perbix	Paul	Jeannot	Glendening	Motte	Sheary	Lilleberg
Sergachev D		46	51	53	49	50	57	54	48	30	47	43	40	43	30	53	54
Cernak D	46		49	49	51	54	53	52	48	45	49	52	51	44	32	44	50	51
Hagel F	51	49		55	53	55	53	60	57	65	47	60	55	67	43	47	64	53
Cirelli F	53	49	55		49	56	54	58	54	55	56	55	52	61	29	66	54	50
Stamkos F	49	51	53	49		50	49	52	52	56	63	52	47	11	42	75	60	50
Raddysh D	50	54	55	56	50		54	55	53	56	50	59	51	57	41	52	53	39
Hedman D	57	53	53	54	49	54		55	55	25	46	49	49	54	36	53	44	17
Kucherov F	54	52	60	58	52	55	55		54	64	61	57	48	66	48	38	43	49
Point F	48	48	57	54	52	53	55	54		64	36	58	45	27	23	56	47	46
de Haan D	30	45	65	55	56	56	25	64	64		51	57	54	53	42	40	47	74
Eyssimont F	47	49	47	56	63	50	46	61	36	51		49	48	51	31	53	46	43
Perbix D	43	52	60	55	52	59	49	57	58	57	49		44	52	36	46	44	45
Paul F	40	51	55	52	47	51	49	48	45	54	48	44		46	25	48	52	44
Jeannot F	43	44	67	61	11	57	54	66	27	53	51	52	46		45	46	43	42
Glendening F	30	32	43	29	42	41	36	48	23	42	31	36	25	45		40	36	42
Motte F	53	44	47	66	75	52	53	38	56	40	53	46	48	46	40		43	43
Sheary F	54	50	64	54	60	53	44	43	47	47	46	44	52	43	36	43		43
Lilleberg D		51	53	50	50	39	17	49	46	74	43	45	44	42	42	43	43

Hover a cell to compare each player with and without the other. Numbers are the pair's 5-on-5 xGF%; blue above 50, red below. Cells are grey until the pair has 100 minutes together.

Line blender

Model-based

How much the forward trios changed each game. Low values mean settled lines; high values mean a coach searching for a spark.

Line-blender index by game