Eastern Conference · Atlantic Division
Toronto Maple Leafs
2019–20·36–25–9·81 points·3rd in the Atlantic, 8th in the Eastern
- Points
- 81#13
- Goal differential
- +15#10
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 51.5%#11
- Power play
- 20.5%#12
- Penalty kill
- 78.8%#24
- GSAx
- −9.2#23
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Maple Leafs. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 70 | 47 | 33 | 80 | +19 | 20:58 | 290 | 16.2% | 25 | 30.6 | +16.4 | 53.9% | |
| 59 | 16 | 51 | 67 | +6 | 21:33 | 154 | 10.4% | 23 | 15.1 | +0.9 | 54.2% | |
| 63 | 26 | 34 | 60 | −7 | 19:33 | 197 | 13.2% | 19 | 23.6 | +2.4 | 53.3% | |
| 68 | 31 | 28 | 59 | −2 | 18:13 | 197 | 15.7% | 15 | 24.2 | +6.8 | 53.0% | |
| 70 | 5 | 34 | 39 | −7 | 21:53 | 169 | 3.0% | 11 | 8.3 | −3.3 | 49.5% | |
| 51 | 21 | 16 | 37 | +13 | 19:06 | 106 | 19.8% | 4 | 20.4 | +0.6 | 52.7% | |
| 69 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 0 | 15:47 | 121 | 10.7% | 3 | 12.1 | +0.9 | 47.2% | |
| 65 | 9 | 19 | 28 | −2 | 14:46 | 88 | 10.2% | 1 | 11.9 | −2.9 | 50.9% | |
| 47 | 3 | 24 | 27 | +6 | 24:12 | 123 | 2.4% | 7 | 6.2 | −3.2 | 51.6% | |
| 58 | 9 | 16 | 25 | −3 | 10:50 | 73 | 12.3% | 4 | 7.4 | +1.6 | 48.8% | |
| 39 | 8 | 15 | 23 | +7 | 15:35 | 98 | 8.2% | 0 | 9.6 | −1.6 | 51.5% | |
| 53 | 6 | 17 | 23 | +12 | 21:36 | 99 | 6.1% | 0 | 4.2 | +1.8 | 52.5% | |
| 43 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 15:45 | 78 | 10.3% | 5 | 9.4 | −1.4 | 52.0% | |
| 68 | 2 | 16 | 18 | +13 | 18:31 | 89 | 2.2% | 0 | 5.1 | −3.1 | 53.1% | |
| 48 | 8 | 7 | 15 | +4 | 11:56 | 72 | 11.1% | 0 | 8.8 | −0.8 | 51.8% | |
| 61 | 7 | 5 | 12 | −4 | 9:23 | 42 | 16.7% | 0 | 4.5 | +2.5 | 47.0% | |
| 56 | 4 | 7 | 11 | +14 | 17:19 | 65 | 6.2% | 0 | 2.4 | +1.6 | 53.1% | |
| 39 | 4 | 5 | 9 | +1 | 8:06 | 34 | 11.8% | 0 | 2.3 | +1.7 | 50.7% | |
| 28 | 1 | 7 | 8 | −7 | 14:19 | 22 | 4.5% | 0 | 0.9 | +0.1 | 48.7% | |
| 56 | 1 | 7 | 8 | +7 | 20:32 | 48 | 2.1% | 0 | 2.5 | −1.5 | 50.2% | |
| 27 | 3 | 2 | 5 | −3 | 12:53 | 41 | 7.3% | 0 | 5.1 | −2.1 | 45.8% | |
| 26 | 1 | 3 | 4 | −1 | 15:12 | 28 | 3.6% | 0 | 1.1 | −0.1 | 49.3% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +2 | 9:13 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 0.9 | +1.1 | 40.2% | |
| 16 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −4 | 11:07 | 19 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.0 | −2.0 | 50.2% | |
| 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | +1 | 7:51 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.4 | −0.4 | 50.7% | |
| 16 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −1 | 9:33 | 21 | 4.8% | 0 | 1.9 | −0.9 | 42.6% | |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8:42 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | −0.2 | 36.0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8:05 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.3 | −0.3 | 29.5% | |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −5 | 10:18 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 36.3% | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 10:08 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0 | +1.0 | 40.4% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 52 | 52 | 29 | 13 | 7 | .909 | 2.85 | 3 | −2.7 | .715 | |
| 15 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 1 | .886 | 3.66 | 1 | −4.8 | .721 | |
| 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | .915 | 2.63 | 0 | +0.5 | .571 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .842 | 6.00 | 0 | −2.2 | .500 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Starter
69th percentile among qualified goalies, blending goaltending 75%, usage 25%.
- Starter
- Backup
- Third string / AHL
Goaltending
Starter- Save %.90946th pct
- GSAx−2.739th pct
- GSAx /60-0.0539th pct
- High-danger SV%.71518th pct
- Medium-danger SV%.87855th pct
- Low-danger SV%.96962nd pct
- Rebound control+1.8597th pct
- GAA (lower is better)2.8541st pct
Usage
Starter- Games started5295th pct
- Shots faced /6031.4757th pct
- xG faced /602.8052nd pct
Percentiles among goalies with 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.