Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 27, 2010·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

New Jersey Devils 2, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 69% of the time.

SJS winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD01111018229
SJS31711319539

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:57SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Dany Heatley, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:16SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Joe Thornton, Dany Heatley · Wrap-around, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:59SJSJoe ThorntonGWGAssists: Patrick Marleau, Jason Demers · Deflected, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P2 3:06NJDDavid ClarksonAssists: Matthew Corrente, Henrik Tallinder · Slap, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:55SJSJoe ThorntonPPAssists: Dany Heatley · Slap, 0.30 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:47SJSDany HeatleyAssists: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau · Slap, 0.21 xG1–5
  7. P3 14:22NJDAndy GreenePPAssists: Dainius Zubrus, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.31 xG2–5
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 5:40SJSScott Nichol: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 10:04SJSJamal Mayers: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:04NJDAdam Mair: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 13:03SJSNiclas Wallin: Interference2 min
  5. P1 15:39NJDHenrik Tallinder: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 7:10SJSJamal Mayers: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 8:29NJDJacob Josefson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P2 15:56NJDMatthew Corrente: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P2 19:29SJSRyane Clowe: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 19:29NJDMatthew Corrente: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 9:05SJSRyane Clowe: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 13:54SJSDany Heatley: Holding2 min · PPG
  13. P3 15:22SJSDouglas Murray: High sticking2 min
  14. P3 15:22NJDMatthew Corrente: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  15. P3 15:22NJDMatthew Corrente: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 15:22NJDMatthew Corrente: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← NJD attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pavelski won the faceoff against Zajac
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDSJS
29Shots on goal39
2.5Expected goals3.7
53Shot attempts64
19Faceoffs won35
5Power plays3
38Penalty minutes22
18Hits23
14Blocked shots14
12Giveaways15
9Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. Zubrus – Kovalchuk – Pelley2:16

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Arnott – Elias – Clarkson3:00

    xG 0.05–0.05 (52%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Mair – Sestito – Pelley2:02

    xG 0.04–0.07 (38%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Clarkson – Sestito – Josefson2:02

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. White – Taormina5:18

    xG 0.06–0.11 (34%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

  2. Tallinder – Corrente6:01

    xG 0.24–0.33 (42%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  3. Magnan – Greene5:28

    xG 0.05–0.15 (25%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestClowe – Pavelski – Setoguchi8:57

    xG 0.77–0.15 (84%)attempts 15–5goals 0–1

  2. Thornton – Marleau – Heatley10:24

    xG 0.64–0.10 (87%)attempts 12–7goals 4–0

  3. Mitchell – McGinn – Couture9:18

    xG 0.60–0.07 (90%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  4. Mayers – Nichol – McCarthy5:26

    xG 0.04–0.07 (36%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHuskins – Demers10:45

    xG 0.81–0.27 (75%)attempts 13–8goals 2–0

  2. Boyle – Murray15:24

    xG 0.66–0.35 (65%)attempts 15–15goals 1–0

  3. Wallin – Vlasic11:54

    xG 0.60–0.31 (66%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.7 xGNJD 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #689 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 69% of the time.

SJS winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).