Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 8, 2011·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

Buffalo Sabres 7, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 73% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11115512728
TBL113211110434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:36TBLSean BergenheimAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Brett Clark · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:43BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Jordan Leopold · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:58TBLVincent LecavalierAssists: Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:24TBLSean BergenheimAssists: Ryan Malone · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:10BUFThomas VanekAssists: Mike Weber · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:26BUFJordan LeopoldAssists: Tyler Ennis · Slap, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:14BUFTim ConnollyAssists: Tyler Ennis · Backhand, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:01BUFThomas VanekGWGAssists: Cody McCormick · Wrist, 0.09 xG5–3
  9. P3 11:56BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Shaone Morrisonn, Mike Weber · Wrist, 0.04 xG6–3
  10. P3 13:27BUFDrew StaffordPPAssists: Jordan Leopold, Thomas Vanek · Wrist, 0.04 xG7–3
  11. P3 16:19TBLVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Steven Stamkos · Slap, 0.09 xG7–4
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 1:46TBLSteven Stamkos: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 14:54TBLRyan Malone: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 15:05BUFTyler Myers: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 0:45TBLDominic Moore: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 5:41BUFNathan Gerbe: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 12:01BUFJochen Hecht: Elbowing2 min
  7. P3 4:26BUFTim Connolly: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 4:26TBLSteve Downie: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 4:26TBLSteve Downie: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 4:43TBLVictor Hedman: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 4:43BUFDrew Stafford: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 4:43TBLVictor Hedman: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 5:56BUFJordan Leopold: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 12:32TBLSean Bergenheim: High sticking2 min · PPG
  15. P3 14:23TBLMarc-Andre Bergeron: Slashing2 min
  16. P3 14:23BUFCody McCormick: Roughing2 min · PPG
  17. P3 15:17BUFDrew Stafford: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Gaustad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTBL
28Shots on goal34
1.4Expected goals2.6
49Shot attempts68
32Faceoffs won33
5Power plays5
16Penalty minutes26
18Hits29
18Blocked shots16
5Giveaways14
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Hecht – Pominville – Gerbe3:06

    xG 0.22–0.18 (55%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. McCormick – Gerbe – Byron5:00

    xG 0.10–0.17 (36%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Niedermayer – Grier – Gaustad12:31

    xG 0.11–0.22 (33%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Connolly – Stafford – Ennis7:21

    xG 0.15–0.29 (34%)attempts 4–9goals 3–1

Defence pairs

  1. Sekera – Myers10:56

    xG 0.34–0.53 (39%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  2. Leopold – Butler13:59

    xG 0.23–0.53 (30%)attempts 8–19goals 2–0

  3. Morrisonn – Weber15:37

    xG 0.27–0.67 (28%)attempts 8–17goals 3–2

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Downie – Stamkos10:30

    xG 0.57–0.10 (85%)attempts 21–6goals 0–0

  2. Lecavalier – Gagne – Purcell10:41

    xG 0.41–0.24 (63%)attempts 14–6goals 1–3

  3. Hall – Moore – Tyrell7:53

    xG 0.11–0.01 (91%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. St. Louis – Bergenheim – Stamkos3:19

    xG 0.15–0.30 (34%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOhlund – Hedman10:45

    xG 0.78–0.20 (79%)attempts 18–7goals 2–2

  2. Kubina – Jones14:51

    xG 0.27–0.18 (60%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Bergeron9:51

    xG 0.23–0.38 (38%)attempts 12–10goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.6 xGBUF 1.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #89 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 73% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).