Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 2, 2011·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 60% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI3140507326
BUF0811518231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:43PHISean CouturierAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Andreas Lilja · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:56PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Zac Rinaldo · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–0
  3. P1 6:23PHIScott HartnellGWGAssists: Claude Giroux, Jaromir Jagr · Slap, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 7:49BUFAndrej SekeraAssists: Jordan Leopold, Luke Adam · Slap, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 8:29BUFLuke AdamAssists: Thomas Vanek, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–2
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 13:05PHIBen Holmstrom: Holding2 min
  2. P2 1:40PHIJaromir Jagr: Holding2 min
  3. P2 8:27PHIKimmo Timonen: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 15:24PHIJakub Voracek: Holding2 min
  5. P2 0:00BUFDerek Roy: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 0:00BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 0:00PHIBraydon Coburn: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 0:00PHIZac Rinaldo: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 0:00PHIZac Rinaldo: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 0:00BUFMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 3:26PHIClaude Giroux: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 3:26BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 3:26PHIAndrej Meszaros: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 3:26BUFPaul Gaustad: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 3:26BUFPaul Gaustad: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 13:40BUFRobyn Regehr: Elbowing2 min
  17. P3 19:44PHIAndreas Nodl: Elbowing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Talbot won the faceoff against Adam
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
26Shots on goal31
1.7Expected goals2.1
38Shot attempts59
19Faceoffs won36
3Power plays5
31Penalty minutes17
16Hits19
18Blocked shots7
7Giveaways12
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestJagr – Hartnell – Giroux13:18

    xG 0.62–0.11 (85%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Voracek – Couturier8:52

    xG 0.46–0.07 (87%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  3. Shelley – Rinaldo – Holmstrom2:46

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Talbot – Nodl – Simmonds10:15

    xG 0.14–0.44 (25%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLilja – Meszaros8:28

    xG 0.48–0.15 (76%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  2. Carle – Gustafsson13:38

    xG 0.35–0.28 (55%)attempts 6–11goals 1–1

  3. Carle – Meszaros2:37

    xG 0.03–0.08 (28%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Stafford – Leino11:57

    xG 0.53–0.36 (60%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Boyes – McCormick – Ellis3:27

    xG 0.04–0.01 (78%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Vanek – Adam7:47

    xG 0.15–0.24 (38%)attempts 6–7goals 2–0

  4. Gaustad – Kaleta – Gerbe6:34

    xG 0.00–0.32 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Sekera – Myers14:33

    xG 0.44–0.45 (49%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  2. Regehr – Weber10:58

    xG 0.23–0.41 (36%)attempts 11–9goals 0–2

  3. Leopold – Ehrhoff13:12

    xG 0.19–0.48 (29%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.1 xGPHI 1.7 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 61/100 · #446 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.13 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 60% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).