Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 5, 2011·Scotiabank Place, Ottawa

Buffalo Sabres 3, Ottawa Senators 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 57% of the time.

OTT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF06215010023333
OTT1711603012227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:41OTTMilan MichalekAssists: Chris Phillips, Craig Anderson · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:39BUFDerek RoyAssists: Drew Stafford, Ville Leino · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:55BUFJordan LeopoldAssists: Nathan Gerbe, Paul Gaustad · Wrist, 0.37 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:13OTTErik CondraAssists: Zack Smith · Snap, 0.13 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. OTT Milan Michalek scored
  2. 2. BUF Thomas Vanek scored
  3. 3. OTT Jason Spezza scored
  4. 4. BUF Brad Boyes scored
  5. 5. OTT Erik Karlsson stopped
  6. 6. BUF Nathan Gerbe stopped
  7. 7. OTT Nick Foligno stopped
  8. 8. BUF Jason Pominville stopped
  9. 9. OTT Kaspars Daugavins stopped
  10. 10. BUF Drew Stafford stopped
  11. 11. OTT Bobby Butler stopped
  12. 12. BUF Derek Roy scored
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 14:02OTTFilip Kuba: Closing hand on puck2 min
  2. P1 14:40BUFDerek Roy: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:33OTTSergei Gonchar: Holding2 min
  4. P3 4:18BUFThomas Vanek: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smith won the faceoff against Adam
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFOTT
33Shots on goal27
3.2Expected goals2.7
59Shot attempts64
24Faceoffs won35
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
19Hits23
19Blocked shots19
9Giveaways6
13Takeaways22

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Vanek – Adam9:33

    xG 0.74–0.27 (73%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Boyes – Gaustad – Gerbe11:32

    xG 0.83–0.70 (54%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  3. McCormick – Ellis – Tropp8:22

    xG 0.28–0.22 (56%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  4. Roy – Stafford – Leino14:25

    xG 0.57–0.60 (49%)attempts 15–17goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRegehr – Leopold16:12

    xG 0.98–0.50 (67%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Gragnani12:44

    xG 0.33–0.53 (38%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – Myers16:29

    xG 0.67–0.92 (42%)attempts 16–20goals 1–1

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeil – Condra – Smith2:51

    xG 0.40–0.08 (84%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Condra – Winchester – Filatov5:35

    xG 0.31–0.13 (70%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – Michalek – Greening10:34

    xG 0.53–0.38 (59%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  4. Neil – Daugavins – Smith7:57

    xG 0.24–0.20 (54%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGonchar – Phillips16:24

    xG 0.88–0.37 (71%)attempts 21–11goals 0–1

  2. Kuba – Karlsson19:20

    xG 0.91–0.87 (51%)attempts 21–19goals 1–0

  3. Lee – Cowen13:43

    xG 0.12–1.19 (9%)attempts 7–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.7 xGBUF 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #572 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 57% of the time.

OTT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).