Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 7, 2011·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 5, Buffalo Sabres 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI116390613534
BUF313051501424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:16BUFVille LeinoPPAssists: Zack Kassian, Luke Adam · Wrist, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:55BUFZack KassianAssists: Andrej Sekera · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:37BUFThomas VanekPPAssists: Jason Pominville, Derek Roy · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:59PHIMax TalbotAssists: Jakub Voracek · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:17PHIMatt ReadAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:45PHIScott HartnellAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P2 17:48PHIJaromir JagrAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:25BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Jason Pominville, Marc-Andre Gragnani · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:37PHIClaude GirouxGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.22 xG5–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:37PHIKimmo Timonen: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:58PHIZac Rinaldo: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:27BUFJoe Finley: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 19:29PHIAndrej Meszaros: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 0:00PHIZac Rinaldo: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 0:00BUFCorey Tropp: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 3:10PHIMarc-Andre Bourdon: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 3:10PHIMarc-Andre Bourdon: Boarding2 min
  9. P2 3:10BUFMatt Ellis: Instigator misconduct10 min
  10. P2 3:10BUFMatt Ellis: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 3:10BUFMatt Ellis: Instigator2 min
  12. P2 11:54PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Hecht
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
34Shots on goal24
2.6Expected goals1.7
59Shot attempts44
33Faceoffs won27
1Power plays4
20Penalty minutes24
23Hits17
11Blocked shots10
12Giveaways12
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestJagr – Hartnell – Giroux13:23

    xG 0.42–0.14 (75%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  2. Talbot – van Riemsdyk – Voracek13:12

    xG 0.55–0.40 (58%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  3. Rinaldo – Zolnierczyk – Couturier4:08

    xG 0.10–0.01 (89%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Simmonds – Read – Couturier4:52

    xG 0.09–0.14 (38%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Bourdon14:10

    xG 0.60–0.11 (85%)attempts 15–6goals 1–1

  2. Timonen – Coburn16:13

    xG 0.62–0.37 (62%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0

  3. Carle – Meszaros5:33

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Roy – Stafford – Ennis12:06

    xG 0.17–0.25 (41%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Ellis – Gerbe – Tropp3:11

    xG 0.01–0.09 (12%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  3. Hecht – Pominville – Vanek15:02

    xG 0.35–0.46 (43%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0

  4. Leino – Adam – Kassian10:49

    xG 0.30–0.47 (39%)attempts 8–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Finley2:57

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Sekera – McNabb4:48

    xG 0.11–0.04 (75%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

  3. Gragnani – McNabb2:30

    xG 0.01–0.01 (64%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.7 xGPHI 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #13 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.49 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 67% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).